H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Tim Henman H2H: 5-1

David Nalbandian holds a 5–1 lead over Tim Henman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, David Nalbandian leads 3–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2006 Madrid Masters fourth round 6-2 2-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Nalbandian
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 21, 2006* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard David Nalbandian #4 6-2 2-6 7-5 Tim Henman #41 Match data
Oct 25, 2003* Basel ATP 250 QF Carpet David Nalbandian #9 6-2 6-4 Tim Henman #32 Match data
Aug 7, 2003* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard David Nalbandian #21 6-4 6-4 Tim Henman #30 Match data
Jul 2, 2003* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Tim Henman #29 6-2 6-7(4) 7-5 6-3 David Nalbandian #9 Match data
Oct 26, 2002* Basel ATP 250 QF Carpet David Nalbandian #18 3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 Tim Henman #6 Match data
Aug 3, 2002* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard David Nalbandian #14 4-6 7-6(7) 7-5 Tim Henman #4 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,070 356 185 65.8% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Tim Henman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,738 0 0 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 1,988 0 2 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,905 0 2 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,982 0 4 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,940 0 5 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,032 0 7 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6
26 2008 37–14 72.5% #11 2,014 0 9 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,935 0 10 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,005 0 11 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,940 0 11 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11
30 2012 20–15 57.1% #82 1,883 0 11 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,871 0 11 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11