H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Tommy Haas H2H: 0-5

Tommy Haas holds a 5–0 lead over David Nalbandian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Tommy Haas leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2012 Cincinnati Masters second round 6-7(0) 7-6(4) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Nalbandian
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 5
5 main draw meetings
Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 14, 2012* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tommy Haas #23 6-7(0) 7-6(4) 6-3 David Nalbandian #39 Match data
Aug 8, 2012* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tommy Haas #25 6-2 6-7(11) 6-3 David Nalbandian #38 Match data
Jan 23, 2007* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Tommy Haas #12 4-6 6-3 6-2 6-3 David Nalbandian #8 Match data
Nov 3, 2005* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Tommy Haas #47 6-4 6-3 David Nalbandian #12 Match data
May 2, 2002* Munich ATP 250 R32 Clay Tommy Haas #7 7-5 4-6 6-1 David Nalbandian #31 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,070 356 185 65.8% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Tommy Haas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,738 0 0 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 1,988 0 2 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,905 0 2 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,982 0 4 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,940 0 5 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,032 0 7 — — — — — — —
26 2008 37–14 72.5% #11 2,014 0 9 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,935 0 10 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,005 0 11 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,940 0 11 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11
30 2012 20–15 57.1% #82 1,883 0 11 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,871 0 11 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12
32 — — — — — — — 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12
33 — — — — — — — 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12
34 — — — — — — — 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13
35 — — — — — — — 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15
36 — — — — — — — 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15
37 — — — — — — — 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15
39 — — — — — — — 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15