H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Tommy Robredo H2H: 6-3

David Nalbandian holds a 6–3 lead over Tommy Robredo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on clay, while David Nalbandian leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tommy Robredo won the 2011 Buenos Aires quarterfinal 6-4 6-4.

ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
6 3
9 main draw meetings
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 19, 2011* Buenos Aires ATP 250 QF Clay Tommy Robredo #32 6-4 6-4 David Nalbandian #20 Match data
Aug 12, 2010* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard David Nalbandian #45 6-3 6-0 Tommy Robredo #38 Match data
Apr 16, 2010* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay David Nalbandian #151 6-3 6-4 Tommy Robredo #23 Match data
Apr 25, 2008* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay David Nalbandian #7 6-1 6-0 Tommy Robredo #18 Match data
Apr 22, 2006* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Tommy Robredo #19 5-7 6-1 7-5 David Nalbandian #3 Match data
Jan 25, 2006* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard David Nalbandian #4 6-3 6-0 2-6 6-2 Tommy Robredo #19 Match data
Aug 1, 2002* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard David Nalbandian #14 7-6(1) 6-3 Tommy Robredo #34 Match data
Sep 29, 2001* Palermo ATP 250 SF Clay David Nalbandian #65 6-2 7-6(4) Tommy Robredo #32 Match data
Jul 28, 2001* Sopot ATP 250 SF Clay Tommy Robredo #51 6-3 6-2 David Nalbandian #92 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,070 356 185 65.8% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Tommy Robredo #1,059 #5 2,770 2,048 523 351 59.8% 0 1 0 0 11 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Tommy Robredo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 2–2 50.0% #244 1,534 0 0
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0 2000 0–2 0.0% #131 1,496 0 0
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,738 0 0 2001 37–20 64.9% #30 1,761 0 1
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 2002 32–25 56.1% #30 1,794 0 1
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 1,988 0 2 2003 38–26 59.4% #21 1,761 0 1
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,905 0 2 2004 39–24 61.9% #13 1,823 0 2
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,982 0 4 2005 42–24 63.6% #19 1,849 0 2
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,940 0 5 2006 49–26 65.3% #7 1,868 0 4
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,032 0 7 2007 48–25 65.8% #10 1,856 0 6
26 2008 37–14 72.5% #11 2,014 0 9 2008 35–22 61.4% #21 1,882 0 7
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,935 0 10 2009 46–24 65.7% #16 1,903 0 9
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,005 0 11 2010 20–23 46.5% #50 1,796 0 9
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,940 0 11 2011 20–14 58.8% #51 1,760 0 10
30 2012 20–15 57.1% #82 1,883 0 11 2012 5–7 41.7% #114 1,752 0 10
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,871 0 11 2013 36–20 64.3% #18 2,000 0 12
32 2014 43–26 62.3% #17 1,998 0 12
33 2015 23–20 53.5% #42 1,883 0 12
34 2016 2–6 25.0% #358 1,814 0 12
35 2017 6–11 35.3% #164 1,740 0 12
36 2018 0–2 0.0% #201 1,684 0 12
37 2019 0–1 0.0% #205 1,582 0 12
40 2022 0–1 0.0% #1043 1,502 0 12