H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Vincent Spadea H2H: 4-0

David Nalbandian holds a 4–0 lead over Vincent Spadea in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, David Nalbandian leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2007 Miami Masters second round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Nalbandian
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Vincent Spadea
USA Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 22, 2007* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard David Nalbandian #11 6-3 6-4 Vincent Spadea #74 Match data
Oct 29, 2004* Basel ATP 250 R16 Carpet David Nalbandian #10 6-4 6-4 Vincent Spadea #21 Match data
May 9, 2004* Rome Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay David Nalbandian #8 6-4 6-3 Vincent Spadea #34 Match data
Aug 9, 2003* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard David Nalbandian #21 6-4 6-2 Vincent Spadea #34 Match data
Aug 28, 2001* US Open Grand Slam Q3 Q Hard David Nalbandian #80 6-0 7-5 Vincent Spadea #173 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,070 356 185 65.8% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Vincent Spadea #1,474 #18 1,629 1,876 310 348 47.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

David Nalbandian Vincent Spadea
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0 1993 1–5 16.7% #303 1,483 0 0
2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,738 0 0 1994 11–13 45.8% #75 1,561 0 0
2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 1995 21–28 42.9% #81 1,639 0 0
2003 38–20 65.5% #8 1,988 0 2 1996 27–22 55.1% #54 1,711 0 0
2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,905 0 2 1997 20–26 43.5% #88 1,695 0 0
2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,982 0 4 1998 28–27 50.9% #42 1,752 0 0
2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,940 0 5 1999 33–27 55.0% #20 1,763 0 0
2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,032 0 7 2000 3–23 11.5% #213 1,545 0 0
2008 37–14 72.5% #11 2,014 0 9 2001 1–3 25.0% #125 1,534 0 0
2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,935 0 10 2002 13–17 43.3% #67 1,623 0 0
2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,005 0 11 2003 34–25 57.6% #29 1,723 0 0
2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,940 0 11 2004 39–25 60.9% #20 1,784 0 1
2012 20–15 57.1% #82 1,883 0 11 2005 21–24 46.7% #75 1,665 0 1
2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,871 0 11 2006 19–26 42.2% #73 1,627 0 1
— — — — — — — 2007 24–28 46.2% #77 1,650 0 1
— — — — — — — 2008 13–19 40.6% #76 1,657 0 1
— — — — — — — 2009 2–9 18.2% #295 1,526 0 1
— — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #1517 1,480 0 1