H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 19:16 UTC
David Nalbandian vs V. Voltchkov H2H: 1-0
David Nalbandian holds a 1–0 lead over V. Voltchkov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Nalbandian leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2003 Wimbledon first round 7-5 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BLR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2003* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | David Nalbandian | 7-5 6-4 6-2 | V. Voltchkov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Nalbandian | #231 | #3 | 3,500 | 2,070 | 356 | 185 | 65.8% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 11 |
| V. Voltchkov | #1,605 | #25 | 1,108 | 1,784 | 50 | 68 | 42.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| David Nalbandian | V. Voltchkov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #668 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 17–9 | 65.4% | #47 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #12 | 1,856 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #162 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #8 | 1,988 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #174 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #9 | 1,905 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 13–7 | 65.0% | #46 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #6 | 1,982 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #99 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #73 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #9 | 2,032 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #120 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 37–14 | 72.5% | #11 | 2,014 | 0 | 9 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #192 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #64 | 1,935 | 0 | 10 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #27 | 2,005 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #64 | 1,940 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #82 | 1,883 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #229 | 1,871 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |