H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
David Nalbandian vs Wayne Ferreira H2H: 1-1
David Nalbandian and Wayne Ferreira are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2004 Australian Open third round 6-2 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 54
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2004* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | David Nalbandian | 6-2 6-4 7-5 | Wayne Ferreira | Match data |
| Jan 18, 2002* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Wayne Ferreira | 6-7(5) 7-6(2) 7-5 6-3 | David Nalbandian | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Nalbandian | #231 | #3 | 3,500 | 2,070 | 356 | 185 | 65.8% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 11 |
| Wayne Ferreira | #1,099 | #6 | 2,701 | 2,022 | 483 | 314 | 60.6% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Nalbandian | Wayne Ferreira | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #173 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 17–9 | 65.4% | #47 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #12 | 1,856 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,847 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2003 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #8 | 1,988 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #22 | 1,819 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2004 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #9 | 1,905 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #12 | 1,923 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2005 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #6 | 1,982 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 55–25 | 68.8% | #9 | 1,925 | 0 | 11 |
| 24 | 2006 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #10 | 1,838 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 2007 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #9 | 2,032 | 0 | 7 | 1997 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #42 | 1,809 | 0 | 13 |
| 26 | 2008 | 37–14 | 72.5% | #11 | 2,014 | 0 | 9 | 1998 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #26 | 1,823 | 0 | 13 |
| 27 | 2009 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #64 | 1,935 | 0 | 10 | 1999 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #53 | 1,704 | 0 | 13 |
| 28 | 2010 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #27 | 2,005 | 0 | 11 | 2000 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #13 | 1,895 | 0 | 14 |
| 29 | 2011 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #64 | 1,940 | 0 | 11 | 2001 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 14 |
| 30 | 2012 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #82 | 1,883 | 0 | 11 | 2002 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #39 | 1,811 | 0 | 14 |
| 31 | 2013 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #229 | 1,871 | 0 | 11 | 2003 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #26 | 1,762 | 0 | 15 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #128 | 1,692 | 0 | 15 |