H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
David Nalbandian vs Yen-Hsun Lu H2H: 1-1
David Nalbandian and Yen-Hsun Lu are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Yen-Hsun Lu won the 2009 Australian Open second round 6-4 5-7 4-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
TPE
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2009* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Yen-Hsun Lu | 6-4 5-7 4-6 6-4 6-2 | David Nalbandian | Match data |
| Sep 17, 2004* | Beijing | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | David Nalbandian | 6-7(6) 6-4 6-4 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Nalbandian | #231 | #3 | 3,500 | 2,070 | 356 | 185 | 65.8% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 11 |
| Yen-Hsun Lu | #991 | #33 | 1,244 | 1,855 | 143 | 222 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| David Nalbandian | Yen-Hsun Lu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #87 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 17–9 | 65.4% | #47 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #158 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #12 | 1,856 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #89 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #8 | 1,988 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #110 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #9 | 1,905 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #64 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #6 | 1,982 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #98 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #35 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #9 | 2,032 | 0 | 7 | 2011 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #82 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 37–14 | 72.5% | #11 | 2,014 | 0 | 9 | 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #59 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #64 | 1,935 | 0 | 10 | 2013 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #27 | 2,005 | 0 | 11 | 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #38 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #64 | 1,940 | 0 | 11 | 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #77 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #82 | 1,883 | 0 | 11 | 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #229 | 1,871 | 0 | 11 | 2017 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #71 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1008 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #568 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |