H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
David Pate vs Brian Teacher H2H: 2-1
David Pate holds a 2–1 lead over Brian Teacher in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, David Pate leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Brian Teacher leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, David Pate won the 1986 Scottsdale fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 64
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 71
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 1986* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | David Pate | 6-4 6-4 | Brian Teacher | Match data |
| Jun 21, 1984* | Bristol | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Brian Teacher | 6-3 7-6 | David Pate | Match data |
| Nov 3, 1983* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | David Pate | 7-6 6-7 7-6 | Brian Teacher | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Pate | #911 | #18 | 441 | 1,874 | 181 | 168 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Brian Teacher | #938 | #7 | 0 | 2,043 | 338 | 237 | 58.8% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Pate | Brian Teacher | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #121 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #109 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #203 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #81 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #30 | 1,743 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 31–31 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1985 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #26 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #31 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1986 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #30 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #59 | 1,806 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1987 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 63–26 | 70.8% | #20 | 2,039 | 1 | 4 |
| 26 | 1988 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #47 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #9 | 1,987 | 1 | 5 |
| 27 | 1989 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #157 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #19 | 1,935 | 1 | 6 |
| 28 | 1990 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #94 | 1,657 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #29 | 1,822 | 1 | 8 |
| 29 | 1991 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #160 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #53 | 1,765 | 1 | 8 |
| 30 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #396 | 1,572 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #66 | 1,708 | 1 | 8 |
| 31 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #514 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #104 | 1,618 | 1 | 8 |
| 32 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #624 | 1,560 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #911 | 1,541 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |