H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
David Pate vs Dan Goldie H2H: 2-1
David Pate holds a 2–1 lead over Dan Goldie in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, David Pate leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Dan Goldie leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, David Pate won the 1988 Scottsdale fourth round 6-3 3-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 64
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 1988* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | David Pate | 6-3 3-6 7-5 | Dan Goldie | Match data |
| Aug 6, 1987* | Stratton Mountain | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | David Pate | 6-3 7-5 | Dan Goldie | Match data |
| Jul 10, 1987* | Newport | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Dan Goldie | 6-0 4-6 6-4 | David Pate | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Pate | #911 | #18 | 441 | 1,874 | 181 | 168 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Dan Goldie | #738 | #27 | 457 | 1,855 | 122 | 117 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Pate | Dan Goldie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #101 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #203 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #265 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #30 | 1,743 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #113 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1985 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #26 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #50 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1986 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #30 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #29 | 1,801 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1987 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #67 | 1,735 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1988 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #47 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #96 | 1,657 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1989 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #157 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #181 | 1,573 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1990 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #94 | 1,657 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1991 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #160 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #396 | 1,572 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #514 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #624 | 1,560 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #911 | 1,541 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |