H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

David Pate vs Greg Holmes H2H: 2-1

David Pate holds a 2–1 lead over Greg Holmes in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while David Pate leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, David Pate won the 1988 Queen's Club Championships round of 64 6-4 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Pate
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Greg Holmes
USA Age 63 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
David Pate #26 6-4 7-6 Greg Holmes #96 Match data Jun 8, 1988* R64 Queen's Club Championships ATP 250 Grass
Greg Holmes #135 6-1 6-3 David Pate #18 Match data Nov 13, 1987* R32 Frankfurt ATP 250 Carpet
David Pate #30 2-6 7-5 6-4 Greg Holmes #26 Match data Oct 24, 1985* R32 Tokyo Indoor ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Pate #911 #18 441 1,875 181 168 51.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Greg Holmes #1,113 #22 50 1,849 82 92 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Pate Greg Holmes
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
19 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0 1983 3–7 30.0% #308 1,530 0 0
20 1982 2–5 28.6% — 1,484 0 0 1984 16–14 53.3% #59 1,685 0 0
21 1983 5–7 41.7% #203 1,529 0 0 1985 25–19 56.8% #27 1,701 0 0
22 1984 21–13 61.8% #30 1,743 0 1 1986 16–17 48.5% #76 1,675 0 0
23 1985 31–24 56.4% #26 1,742 0 1 1987 11–16 40.7% #117 1,613 0 0
24 1986 35–23 60.3% #30 1,788 0 1 1988 8–14 36.4% #197 1,605 0 0
25 1987 28–18 60.9% #18 1,750 0 2 1989 3–4 42.9% #347 1,641 0 0
26 1988 20–16 55.6% #47 1,715 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 1989 9–19 32.1% #157 1,656 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 1990 16–15 51.6% #94 1,657 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 1991 11–18 37.9% #160 1,596 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 1992 1–4 20.0% #396 1,573 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 1993 1–3 25.0% #514 1,548 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 1994 1–1 50.0% #624 1,561 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 1995 0–1 0.0% #911 1,542 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Pate Greg Holmes
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 3 2 5 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1984 12 8 20 60.0% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1983 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1985 16 8 24 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 6 12 50.0%
22 1984 18 6 24 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1986 11 10 21 52.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
23 1985 15 11 26 57.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 1987 9 8 17 52.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 1986 20 11 31 64.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 8 19 57.9% 1988 7 11 18 38.9% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1987 18 10 28 64.3% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 1989 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 1988 16 11 27 59.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1989 6 14 20 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1990 7 10 17 41.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1991 6 10 16 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1992 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1993 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 113 98 211 53.6% 5 13 18 27.8% 31 26 57 54.4% 32 31 63 50.8% — 59 49 108 54.6% 1 8 9 11.1% 11 16 27 40.7% 11 19 30 36.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Pate Greg Holmes
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1494 102.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.03
19 1981 1494 104.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.00 — 0–2 — -0.08 1983 1530 124.6 — — — — +80 — — 46.9% -0.03 0–4 (0%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.08
20 1982 1485 108.5 — — — — +40 — — 31.6% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.29 1984 1685 127.0 — — — — +19 — -156 51.9% +0.16 5–4 (56%) 8–6 (57%) — +1.36
21 1983 1529 119.4 — — — — +10 — +62 37.9% -0.24 2–1 (67%) 2–8 (20%) — +0.28 1985 1702 138.5 — — — — +68 -188 -161 54.1% +0.36 8–7 (53%) 9–12 (43%) — +0.87
22 1984 1744 140.4 — — — — +36 -218 -186 59.5% +0.43 3–5 (38%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.33 1986 1676 144.9 — — — — +13 — -89 50.6% +0.31 5–6 (45%) 7–12 (37%) — -1.35
23 1985 1743 138.8 — — — — +29 -206 -84 52.4% +0.13 17–9 (65%) 15–13 (54%) — +0.85 1987 1614 133.4 — — — — +68 -107 -60 40.3% -0.49 6–5 (55%) 5–11 (31%) — -1.27
24 1986 1788 146.3 — — — — +34 — -115 58.3% +0.59 8–7 (53%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.85 1988 1606 132.3 — — — — +28 — -48 34.7% -0.80 2–0 4–4 (50%) — -1.94
25 1987 1751 141.1 — — — — +30 — -55 61.5% +0.54 6–11 (35%) 18–11 (62%) — -0.04 1989 1642 112.2 — — — — +2 — -42 45.5% -0.59 1–1 3–1 (75%) — -0.33
26 1988 1716 139.3 — — — — +41 — -25 52.7% +0.32 7–5 (58%) 7–11 (39%) — -1.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1989 1656 135.9 — — — — +19 — +63 35.5% -1.12 5–5 (50%) 5–8 (38%) — -2.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1990 1658 127.8 — — — — -22 — +129 50.6% +0.33 6–5 (55%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1991 1596 133.2 — — — — +31 -112 +179 40.3% -0.61 5–6 (45%) 3–7 (30%) — -0.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1992 1574 104.4 — — — — +24 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1993 1548 104.3 — — — — +35 — — 33.3% -0.78 0–1 0–2 — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1994 1561 100.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -2.20 1–0 — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1995 1542 99.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1875 143.1 — — — — +27 -183 -21 50.8% +0.06 62–57 (52%) 73–84 (46%) 98.7 -0.49 — 1849 141.1 — — — — +42 -148 -108 47.7% -0.03 27–27 (50%) 37–49 (43%) 95.0 -1.50

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.