H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
David Pate vs Hank Pfister H2H: 3-0
David Pate holds a 3–0 lead over Hank Pfister in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, David Pate leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Pate won the 1985 La Quinta fourth round 2-6 7-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 64
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 72
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 1985* | La Quinta | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | David Pate | 2-6 7-6 6-4 | Hank Pfister | Match data |
| Oct 12, 1984* | Tokyo Outdoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | David Pate | 7-5 6-2 | Hank Pfister | Match data |
| Aug 9, 1984* | Cleveland | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | David Pate | 6-3 6-4 | Hank Pfister | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Pate | #911 | #18 | 441 | 1,874 | 181 | 168 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Hank Pfister | #982 | #19 | 0 | 1,926 | 260 | 213 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Pate | Hank Pfister | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1982 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1983 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #203 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #30 | 1,743 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1985 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #26 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #48 | 1,741 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1986 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #30 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #29 | 1,839 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1987 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #30 | 1,841 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1988 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #47 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1989 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #157 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #39 | 1,869 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1990 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #94 | 1,657 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1991 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #160 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #41 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #396 | 1,572 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #86 | 1,722 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #514 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #68 | 1,763 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #624 | 1,560 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #911 | 1,541 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #595 | 1,677 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #980 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |