H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

David Pate vs Jorge Lozano H2H: 2-0

David Pate holds a 2–0 lead over Jorge Lozano in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, David Pate leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Pate won the 1988 Cincinnati Open round of 64 4-6 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Pate
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Jorge Lozano
MEX Age 63 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
David Pate #34 4-6 6-4 6-4 Jorge Lozano #71 Match data Aug 17, 1988* R64 Cincinnati Open ATP 500 Hard
David Pate #20 7-5 6-2 Jorge Lozano #74 Match data Mar 3, 1988* R32 Indian Wells Open ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Pate #911 #18 441 1,875 181 168 51.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Jorge Lozano #804 #51 98 1,654 20 42 32.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Pate Jorge Lozano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1981 0–3 0.0% — 1,473 0 0
19 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0 1982 1–1 50.0% — 1,491 0 0
20 1982 2–5 28.6% — 1,484 0 0 1983 0–1 0.0% #369 1,490 0 0
21 1983 5–7 41.7% #203 1,529 0 0 1984 0–1 0.0% #745 1,482 0 0
22 1984 21–13 61.8% #30 1,743 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 1985 31–24 56.4% #26 1,742 0 1 1986 0–1 0.0% #391 1,470 0 0
24 1986 35–23 60.3% #30 1,788 0 1 1987 3–8 27.3% #107 1,481 0 0
25 1987 28–18 60.9% #18 1,750 0 2 1988 14–15 48.3% #62 1,631 0 0
26 1988 20–16 55.6% #47 1,715 0 2 1989 0–7 0.0% #350 1,508 0 0
27 1989 9–19 32.1% #157 1,656 0 2 1990 2–4 33.3% #248 1,522 0 0
28 1990 16–15 51.6% #94 1,657 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 1991 11–18 37.9% #160 1,596 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 1992 1–4 20.0% #396 1,573 0 2 1993 0–1 0.0% #829 1,503 0 0
31 1993 1–3 25.0% #514 1,548 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 1994 1–1 50.0% #624 1,561 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 1995 0–1 0.0% #911 1,542 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Pate Jorge Lozano
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1983 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1983 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1984 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1984 18 6 24 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1985 15 11 26 57.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 1986 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 1986 20 11 31 64.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 8 19 57.9% 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1987 18 10 28 64.3% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 1988 9 10 19 47.4% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7%
26 1988 16 11 27 59.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
27 1989 6 14 20 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
28 1990 7 10 17 41.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1991 6 10 16 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1992 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1993 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 1993 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 113 98 211 53.6% 5 13 18 27.8% 31 26 57 54.4% 32 31 63 50.8% — 13 21 34 38.2% 1 11 12 8.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Pate Jorge Lozano
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1474 103.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.33 — 0–2 — +0.06
19 1981 1494 104.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.00 — 0–2 — -0.08 1982 1492 108.5 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.20 0–1 1–0 — -0.01
20 1982 1485 108.5 — — — — +40 — — 31.6% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.29 1983 1490 112.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.22
21 1983 1529 119.4 — — — — +10 — +62 37.9% -0.24 2–1 (67%) 2–8 (20%) — +0.28 1984 1483 104.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — -0.09
22 1984 1744 140.4 — — — — +36 -218 -186 59.5% +0.43 3–5 (38%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1985 1743 138.8 — — — — +29 -206 -84 52.4% +0.13 17–9 (65%) 15–13 (54%) — +0.85 1986 1471 103.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.10
24 1986 1788 146.3 — — — — +34 — -115 58.3% +0.59 8–7 (53%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.85 1987 1482 105.6 — — — — +45 — — 24.0% -1.64 2–0 3–3 (50%) — -0.02
25 1987 1751 141.1 — — — — +30 — -55 61.5% +0.54 6–11 (35%) 18–11 (62%) — -0.04 1988 1632 123.1 — — — — +26 -162 — 47.5% -0.70 6–6 (50%) 9–3 (75%) — -0.03
26 1988 1716 139.3 — — — — +41 — -25 52.7% +0.32 7–5 (58%) 7–11 (39%) — -1.56 1989 1508 93.9 — — — — +71 — — 15.8% -1.84 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.64
27 1989 1656 135.9 — — — — +19 — +63 35.5% -1.12 5–5 (50%) 5–8 (38%) — -2.42 1990 1522 105.2 — — — — +60 — — 30.8% -1.23 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.23
28 1990 1658 127.8 — — — — -22 — +129 50.6% +0.33 6–5 (55%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1991 1596 133.2 — — — — +31 -112 +179 40.3% -0.61 5–6 (45%) 3–7 (30%) — -0.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1992 1574 104.4 — — — — +24 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.43 1993 1504 97.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.21
31 1993 1548 104.3 — — — — +35 — — 33.3% -0.78 0–1 0–2 — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1994 1561 100.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -2.20 1–0 — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1995 1542 99.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1875 143.1 — — — — +27 -183 -21 50.8% +0.06 62–57 (52%) 73–84 (46%) 98.7 -0.49 — 1655 116.5 — — — — +38 -162 — 35.4% -1.09 9–14 (39%) 14–13 (52%) 99.7 +0.66

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.