H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
David Pate vs Mark Dickson H2H: 0-1
Mark Dickson holds a 1–0 lead over David Pate in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mark Dickson leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mark Dickson won the 1985 San Francisco third round 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 64
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 66
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 1985* | San Francisco | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Mark Dickson | 7-6 6-2 | David Pate | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Pate | #911 | #18 | 441 | 1,874 | 181 | 168 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Mark Dickson | #1,095 | #32 | 0 | 1,817 | 128 | 118 | 52.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Pate | Mark Dickson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1982 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1983 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #203 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #30 | 1,743 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #41 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1985 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #26 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #66 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1986 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #30 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #35 | 1,810 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1987 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,717 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1988 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #47 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #131 | 1,613 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1989 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #157 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #155 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1990 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #94 | 1,657 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1991 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #160 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #396 | 1,572 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #514 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #624 | 1,560 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #911 | 1,541 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |