H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
David Pate vs Marty Davis H2H: 1-1
David Pate and Marty Davis are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, David Pate leads 1–0 on carpet, while Marty Davis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Pate won the 1986 Atlanta third round 6-4 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 64
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 1986* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | David Pate | 6-4 7-6 | Marty Davis | Match data |
| Sep 30, 1984* | Honolulu | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Marty Davis | 6-1 6-2 | David Pate | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Pate | #911 | #18 | 441 | 1,874 | 181 | 168 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Marty Davis | #811 | #47 | 158 | 1,797 | 151 | 173 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Pate | Marty Davis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1983 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #203 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1984 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #30 | 1,743 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #269 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1985 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #26 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #99 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1986 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #30 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #84 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1987 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #64 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1988 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #47 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #63 | 1,710 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1989 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #157 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #89 | 1,627 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1990 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #94 | 1,657 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #96 | 1,652 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1991 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #160 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #95 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #396 | 1,572 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #143 | 1,618 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #514 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,590 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #624 | 1,560 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #911 | 1,541 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |