H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

David Pate vs Paul Annacone H2H: 4-1

David Pate holds a 4–1 lead over Paul Annacone in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, David Pate leads 2–0 on carpet and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, David Pate won the 1989 Wimbledon round of 128 3-6 7-6 4-6 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Pate
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Paul Annacone
USA Age 63 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
David Pate #147 3-6 7-6 4-6 7-5 6-4 Paul Annacone #34 Match data Jun 28, 1989* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
David Pate #36 7-6 6-2 Paul Annacone #50 Match data Apr 3, 1987* R16 Chicago ATP 250 Carpet
David Pate #26 7-5 6-4 Paul Annacone #13 Match data Apr 4, 1986* R16 Atlanta ATP 250 Carpet
Paul Annacone #36 7-6 6-3 David Pate #22 Match data Aug 9, 1985* R16 Stratton Mountain ATP 250 Hard
David Pate #23 3-6 7-5 6-3 Paul Annacone #33 Match data Jul 13, 1985* QF Newport ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Pate #911 #18 441 1,875 181 168 51.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Paul Annacone #1,209 #12 430 1,942 160 131 55.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Pate Paul Annacone
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
20 1982 2–5 28.6% — 1,484 0 0 1983 5–5 50.0% #389 1,533 0 0
21 1983 5–7 41.7% #203 1,529 0 0 1984 8–9 47.1% #94 1,584 0 0
22 1984 21–13 61.8% #30 1,743 0 1 1985 45–19 70.3% #13 1,883 0 2
23 1985 31–24 56.4% #26 1,742 0 1 1986 18–16 52.9% #43 1,782 0 2
24 1986 35–23 60.3% #30 1,788 0 1 1987 29–20 59.2% #32 1,824 0 2
25 1987 28–18 60.9% #18 1,750 0 2 1988 25–18 58.1% #38 1,784 0 2
26 1988 20–16 55.6% #47 1,715 0 2 1989 17–18 48.6% #65 1,732 0 3
27 1989 9–19 32.1% #157 1,656 0 2 1990 10–17 37.0% #165 1,650 0 3
28 1990 16–15 51.6% #94 1,657 0 2 1991 2–3 40.0% #433 1,641 0 3
29 1991 11–18 37.9% #160 1,596 0 2 1992 1–4 20.0% #225 1,597 0 3
30 1992 1–4 20.0% #396 1,573 0 2 1993 0–1 0.0% #813 1,584 0 3
31 1993 1–3 25.0% #514 1,548 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 1994 1–1 50.0% #624 1,561 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 1995 0–1 0.0% #911 1,542 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Pate Paul Annacone
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1983 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1983 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1984 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
22 1984 18 6 24 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1985 18 7 25 72.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 20 7 27 74.1%
23 1985 15 11 26 57.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 1986 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8%
24 1986 20 11 31 64.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 8 19 57.9% 1987 12 10 22 54.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3%
25 1987 18 10 28 64.3% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 1988 12 10 22 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 4 10 60.0%
26 1988 16 11 27 59.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1989 3 10 13 23.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 4 12 66.7%
27 1989 6 14 20 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 5 10 15 33.3% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
28 1990 7 10 17 41.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1991 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 1991 6 10 16 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1992 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1992 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 1993 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 113 98 211 53.6% 5 13 18 27.8% 31 26 57 54.4% 32 31 63 50.8% — 59 65 124 47.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 39 24 63 61.9% 55 34 89 61.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Pate Paul Annacone
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1981 1494 104.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.00 — 0–2 — -0.08 1982 1492 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.01
20 1982 1485 108.5 — — — — +40 — — 31.6% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.29 1983 1534 110.6 — — — — +27 -19 +42 50.0% -0.04 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — +1.07
21 1983 1529 119.4 — — — — +10 — +62 37.9% -0.24 2–1 (67%) 2–8 (20%) — +0.28 1984 1584 121.3 — — — — -44 — +79 46.8% -0.23 2–1 (67%) 9–4 (69%) — +0.74
22 1984 1744 140.4 — — — — +36 -218 -186 59.5% +0.43 3–5 (38%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.33 1985 1883 150.0 — — — — +31 — -175 59.4% +0.45 18–5 (78%) 22–16 (58%) — +0.51
23 1985 1743 138.8 — — — — +29 -206 -84 52.4% +0.13 17–9 (65%) 15–13 (54%) — +0.85 1986 1783 144.2 — — — — +8 — -28 51.1% +0.27 7–7 (50%) 4–8 (33%) — -1.82
24 1986 1788 146.3 — — — — +34 — -115 58.3% +0.59 8–7 (53%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.85 1987 1824 150.8 — — — — +2 -239 -27 58.2% +0.46 8–9 (47%) 11–12 (48%) — -3.01
25 1987 1751 141.1 — — — — +30 — -55 61.5% +0.54 6–11 (35%) 18–11 (62%) — -0.04 1988 1785 136.2 — — — — -6 -161 +14 56.0% +0.35 6–7 (46%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.06
26 1988 1716 139.3 — — — — +41 — -25 52.7% +0.32 7–5 (58%) 7–11 (39%) — -1.56 1989 1732 134.3 — — — — -17 — +69 49.5% +0.32 6–7 (46%) 4–14 (22%) — -0.38
27 1989 1656 135.9 — — — — +19 — +63 35.5% -1.12 5–5 (50%) 5–8 (38%) — -2.42 1990 1651 127.7 — — — — +8 — +106 44.7% -0.20 3–9 (25%) 7–10 (41%) — -0.79
28 1990 1658 127.8 — — — — -22 — +129 50.6% +0.33 6–5 (55%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.85 1991 1641 101.3 -0.79 -2.06 0.687 45.5% — — — 40.0% -1.00 2–0 2–0 — +0.29
29 1991 1596 133.2 — — — — +31 -112 +179 40.3% -0.61 5–6 (45%) 3–7 (30%) — -0.86 1992 1598 102.6 -0.71 -1.39 0.874 47.9% +11 — — 40.0% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.03
30 1992 1574 104.4 — — — — +24 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.43 1993 1585 100.6 -3.42 +1.40 0.666 42.9% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00
31 1993 1548 104.3 — — — — +35 — — 33.3% -0.78 0–1 0–2 — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1994 1561 100.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -2.20 1–0 — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1995 1542 99.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1875 143.1 — — — — +27 -183 -21 50.8% +0.06 62–57 (52%) 73–84 (46%) 98.7 -0.49 — 1942 144.9 -1.04 -1.30 0.788 46.6% +6 -164 -5 53.1% +0.22 55–51 (52%) 72–77 (48%) 97.0 -1.22

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.