H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

David Pate vs Thierry Tulasne H2H: 3-0

David Pate holds a 3–0 lead over Thierry Tulasne in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, David Pate leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, David Pate won the 1989 Cincinnati Open round of 64 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Pate
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Thierry Tulasne
FRA Age 63 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
David Pate #137 6-3 6-1 Thierry Tulasne #110 Match data Aug 16, 1989* R64 Cincinnati Open ATP 500 Hard
David Pate #24 6-7 6-4 6-2 Thierry Tulasne #18 Match data Nov 13, 1986* R32 Wembley ATP 250 Carpet
David Pate #30 3-6 6-3 6-1 5-7 6-4 Thierry Tulasne #12 Match data Aug 28, 1986* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Pate #911 #18 441 1,875 181 168 51.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Thierry Tulasne #1,117 #10 334 1,938 215 206 51.1% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Pate Thierry Tulasne
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1979 0–1 0.0% #579 1,487 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1980 9–13 40.9% #113 1,543 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1981 26–23 53.1% #59 1,675 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 1982 18–21 46.2% #95 1,723 0 1
19 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0 1983 17–18 48.6% #82 1,663 0 1
20 1982 2–5 28.6% — 1,484 0 0 1984 15–14 51.7% #54 1,722 0 1
21 1983 5–7 41.7% #203 1,529 0 0 1985 34–21 61.8% #23 1,879 0 4
22 1984 21–13 61.8% #30 1,743 0 1 1986 37–21 63.8% #20 1,759 0 5
23 1985 31–24 56.4% #26 1,742 0 1 1987 26–20 56.5% #57 1,682 0 5
24 1986 35–23 60.3% #30 1,788 0 1 1988 18–20 47.4% #75 1,675 0 5
25 1987 28–18 60.9% #18 1,750 0 2 1989 10–17 37.0% #127 1,609 0 5
26 1988 20–16 55.6% #47 1,715 0 2 1990 5–13 27.8% #158 1,533 0 5
27 1989 9–19 32.1% #157 1,656 0 2 1991 0–4 0.0% #374 1,494 0 5
28 1990 16–15 51.6% #94 1,657 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 1991 11–18 37.9% #160 1,596 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 1992 1–4 20.0% #396 1,573 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 1993 1–3 25.0% #514 1,548 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 1994 1–1 50.0% #624 1,561 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 1995 0–1 0.0% #911 1,542 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Pate Thierry Tulasne
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 3 3 6 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 5 6 11 45.5% 17 8 25 68.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 15 13 28 53.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
19 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 0 4 4 0.0% 16 13 29 55.2% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1984 1 3 4 25.0% 14 11 25 56.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1983 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1985 7 7 14 50.0% 27 11 38 71.1% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1984 18 6 24 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1986 9 5 14 64.3% 23 12 35 65.7% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6%
23 1985 15 11 26 57.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 1987 4 4 8 50.0% 20 13 33 60.6% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
24 1986 20 11 31 64.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 8 19 57.9% 1988 3 6 9 33.3% 14 11 25 56.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1987 18 10 28 64.3% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 1989 3 7 10 30.0% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1988 16 11 27 59.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 5 12 17 29.4% — — — — — — — —
27 1989 6 14 20 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1990 7 10 17 41.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1991 6 10 16 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1992 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1993 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 113 98 211 53.6% 5 13 18 27.8% 31 26 57 54.4% 32 31 63 50.8% — 37 51 88 42.0% 163 122 285 57.2% 2 8 10 20.0% 13 25 38 34.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Pate Thierry Tulasne
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1488 101.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.09
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1544 132.3 — — — — +30 +53 — 43.1% -0.69 3–6 (33%) 1–0 — +1.17
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1676 145.4 — — — — -71 +134 -183 53.7% +0.30 4–8 (33%) 3–6 (33%) — +1.66
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1723 152.9 — — — — -143 +122 — 48.4% +0.07 4–4 (50%) 3–4 (43%) — -2.82
19 1981 1494 104.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.00 — 0–2 — -0.08 1983 1664 138.9 — — — — -129 +105 — 50.0% +0.07 5–8 (38%) 2–3 (40%) — -1.00
20 1982 1485 108.5 — — — — +40 — — 31.6% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.29 1984 1722 146.8 — — — — -203 +92 — 54.9% +0.54 4–7 (36%) 4–3 (57%) — -1.30
21 1983 1529 119.4 — — — — +10 — +62 37.9% -0.24 2–1 (67%) 2–8 (20%) — +0.28 1985 1879 153.4 — — — — -260 +97 — 59.3% +0.92 8–9 (47%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.63
22 1984 1744 140.4 — — — — +36 -218 -186 59.5% +0.43 3–5 (38%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.33 1986 1759 148.4 — — — — -33 +98 — 61.1% +0.85 13–11 (54%) 9–7 (56%) — -0.44
23 1985 1743 138.8 — — — — +29 -206 -84 52.4% +0.13 17–9 (65%) 15–13 (54%) — +0.85 1987 1683 139.7 — — — — -30 +104 — 55.8% +0.28 9–11 (45%) 8–8 (50%) — +1.06
24 1986 1788 146.3 — — — — +34 — -115 58.3% +0.59 8–7 (53%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.85 1988 1675 142.8 — — — — -97 +134 — 46.4% -0.21 6–5 (55%) 9–8 (53%) — -1.33
25 1987 1751 141.1 — — — — +30 — -55 61.5% +0.54 6–11 (35%) 18–11 (62%) — -0.04 1989 1609 129.6 — — — — -82 +142 — 43.8% -0.45 3–6 (33%) 8–5 (62%) — -0.35
26 1988 1716 139.3 — — — — +41 — -25 52.7% +0.32 7–5 (58%) 7–11 (39%) — -1.56 1990 1534 125.6 — — — — — +81 — 39.5% -0.55 0–5 (0%) 1–1 — -0.19
27 1989 1656 135.9 — — — — +19 — +63 35.5% -1.12 5–5 (50%) 5–8 (38%) — -2.42 1991 1495 103.9 +0.22 -2.03 0.681 43.7% — +91 — 10.0% -2.90 — — — -0.04
28 1990 1658 127.8 — — — — -22 — +129 50.6% +0.33 6–5 (55%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1991 1596 133.2 — — — — +31 -112 +179 40.3% -0.61 5–6 (45%) 3–7 (30%) — -0.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1992 1574 104.4 — — — — +24 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1993 1548 104.3 — — — — +35 — — 33.3% -0.78 0–1 0–2 — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1994 1561 100.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -2.20 1–0 — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1995 1542 99.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1875 143.1 — — — — +27 -183 -21 50.8% +0.06 62–57 (52%) 73–84 (46%) 98.7 -0.49 — 1938 150.9 +0.22 -2.03 0.681 43.7% -93 +107 -183 52.0% +0.21 59–81 (42%) 56–52 (52%) 93.2 -0.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.