H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
David Prinosil vs Andrei Olhovskiy H2H: 1-2
Andrei Olhovskiy holds a 2–1 lead over David Prinosil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Andrei Olhovskiy leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Prinosil won the 1996 Moscow quarterfinal 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 1996* | Moscow | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | David Prinosil | 7-5 6-2 | Andrei Olhovskiy | Match data |
| Feb 22, 1996* | Antwerp | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Andrei Olhovskiy | 6-4 7-5 | David Prinosil | Match data |
| Jan 6, 1994* | Doha | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Andrei Olhovskiy | 6-4 7-5 | David Prinosil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Prinosil | #1,091 | #28 | 1,040 | 1,800 | 165 | 208 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Andrei Olhovskiy | #1,310 | #49 | 690 | 1,750 | 113 | 162 | 41.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Prinosil | Andrei Olhovskiy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1992 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #77 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #130 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #50 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #302 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #89 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #136 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #80 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 26–29 | 47.3% | #65 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2001 | 7–22 | 24.1% | #132 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #97 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #229 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #118 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2003 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,521 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1063 | 1,515 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 0–14 | 0.0% | #442 | 1,480 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1256 | 1,470 | 0 | 2 |