H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
David Prinosil vs Diego Nargiso H2H: 0-1
Diego Nargiso holds a 1–0 lead over David Prinosil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Diego Nargiso leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Diego Nargiso won the 1996 Australian Open first round 6-4 7-6(3) 4-6 2-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 56
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 1996* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Diego Nargiso | 6-4 7-6(3) 4-6 2-6 6-3 | David Prinosil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Prinosil | #1,091 | #28 | 1,040 | 1,800 | 165 | 208 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Diego Nargiso | #1,400 | #67 | 531 | 1,702 | 94 | 152 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Prinosil | Diego Nargiso | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #90 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #150 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #77 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #147 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #130 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #109 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #50 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #88 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #120 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #89 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #118 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #183 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #280 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #152 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2001 | 7–22 | 24.1% | #132 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #128 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #229 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #220 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2003 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,521 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #134 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1063 | 1,515 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |