H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
David Prinosil vs George Bastl H2H: 0-2
George Bastl holds a 2–0 lead over David Prinosil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, George Bastl leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, George Bastl won the 2001 US Open first round 6-4 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 51
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2001* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | George Bastl | 6-4 6-2 6-4 | David Prinosil | Match data |
| Aug 23, 2000* | Long Island | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | George Bastl | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | David Prinosil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Prinosil | #1,091 | #28 | 1,040 | 1,800 | 165 | 208 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| George Bastl | #953 | #71 | 569 | 1,657 | 47 | 85 | 35.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Prinosil | George Bastl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1992 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #77 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #130 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #50 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #194 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #89 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #81 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #105 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #115 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2001 | 7–22 | 24.1% | #132 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #229 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2003 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,521 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #128 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1063 | 1,515 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #173 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #464 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #233 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #523 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |