H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

David Prinosil vs Gouichi Motomura H2H: 0-1

Gouichi Motomura holds a 1–0 lead over David Prinosil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gouichi Motomura leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gouichi Motomura won the 1999 Hong Kong Open round of 32 7-5 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Prinosil
GER Age 53 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Gouichi Motomura
JPN Age 52 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gouichi Motomura #222 7-5 4-6 6-3 David Prinosil #72 Match data Apr 8, 1999* R32 Hong Kong Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Prinosil #1,091 #28 1,040 1,793 165 210 44.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Gouichi Motomura #1,422 #134 312 1,500 10 29 25.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Prinosil Gouichi Motomura
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1992 9–9 50.0% #125 1,583 0 0 1993 0–3 0.0% #505 1,464 0 0
20 1993 16–25 39.0% #77 1,634 0 0 1994 0–1 0.0% #377 1,448 0 0
21 1994 8–13 38.1% #130 1,632 0 0 1995 1–2 33.3% #345 1,455 0 0
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #50 1,708 0 1 1996 0–1 0.0% #180 1,444 0 0
23 1996 24–24 50.0% #39 1,771 0 2 1997 0–2 0.0% #264 1,426 0 0
24 1997 16–26 38.1% #89 1,630 0 2 1998 2–2 50.0% #236 1,448 0 0
25 1998 20–25 44.4% #78 1,621 0 2 1999 2–3 40.0% #147 1,454 0 0
26 1999 22–23 48.9% #66 1,671 0 2 2000 1–4 20.0% #221 1,442 0 0
27 2000 22–18 55.0% #38 1,779 0 3 2001 0–2 0.0% #233 1,443 0 0
28 2001 7–22 24.1% #132 1,604 0 3 2002 1–2 33.3% #231 1,433 0 0
29 2002 2–2 50.0% #229 1,591 0 3 2003 1–2 33.3% #256 1,440 0 0
30 2003 0–4 0.0% #276 1,520 0 3 2004 1–1 50.0% #264 1,430 0 0
31 2004 0–1 0.0% #1063 1,514 0 3 2005 0–1 0.0% #308 1,383 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2006 1–3 25.0% #294 1,404 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Prinosil Gouichi Motomura
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1992 — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1993 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1993 9 12 21 42.9% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1995 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1996 13 11 24 54.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 1997 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1997 5 10 15 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 1998 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1998 9 11 20 45.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 7 13 46.2% 1999 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1999 7 10 17 41.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2000 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2000 6 11 17 35.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 7 2 9 77.8% 2001 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 4 14 18 22.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 2002 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 63 94 157 40.1% 13 40 53 24.5% 35 26 61 57.4% 54 50 104 51.9% — 9 24 33 27.3% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 337/375 of David Prinosil's and 33/39 of Gouichi Motomura's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age David Prinosil Gouichi Motomura
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1992 16/18 4.7 5.1 51.2% 68.4% 46.2% 58.7% 43.7% 57.9% 39.8% 1993 2/3 0.5 1.5 73.5% 58.1% 27.6% 56.3% 0.0% 50.4% 24.0%
20 1993 38/41 5.7 5.8 48.0% 70.6% 46.8% 53.3% 40.1% 58.2% 38.8% 1994 1/1 1.0 5.0 61.7% 60.6% 39.0% 60.0% 33.3% 52.3% 41.2%
21 1994 18/21 8.6 7.1 44.8% 77.2% 45.0% 65.0% 33.6% 59.6% 35.1% 1995 2/3 1.0 5.0 53.3% 68.2% 37.0% 47.5% 16.7% 53.8% 29.5%
22 1995 37/37 8.6 5.5 50.5% 78.2% 48.5% 63.9% 44.6% 63.5% 38.1% 1996 1/1 0.0 0.0 61.4% 53.5% 51.9% 50.0% 25.0% 52.9% 24.5%
23 1996 43/48 7.3 4.0 53.1% 75.6% 49.1% 64.9% 39.1% 62.9% 37.6% 1997 2/2 4.0 5.0 54.3% 72.4% 53.5% 56.8% 27.1% 63.9% 35.6%
24 1997 38/42 6.6 3.8 50.7% 72.9% 47.9% 58.1% 42.5% 60.3% 36.0% 1998 3/4 3.3 6.7 59.1% 57.9% 42.0% 52.2% 32.9% 51.6% 32.0%
25 1998 39/45 8.6 5.4 50.7% 78.2% 47.8% 51.6% 43.1% 63.0% 35.7% 1999 4/5 1.0 3.3 52.7% 58.3% 52.0% 48.6% 43.0% 55.4% 40.8%
26 1999 40/45 7.2 4.4 50.7% 76.0% 50.4% 53.9% 37.6% 63.3% 36.1% 2000 5/5 0.8 3.4 50.7% 63.2% 47.4% 43.5% 37.8% 55.1% 33.0%
27 2000 33/40 9.1 5.4 52.5% 75.0% 46.4% 65.6% 39.4% 61.4% 35.4% 2001 2/2 3.5 1.0 50.4% 69.5% 51.2% 51.3% 42.5% 60.7% 32.4%
28 2001 26/29 5.4 4.2 52.8% 69.9% 45.7% 55.7% 37.5% 58.2% 33.3% 2002 1/3 2.0 4.0 48.1% 76.9% 46.4% 71.4% 55.6% 61.1% 53.2%
29 2002 4/4 6.3 7.3 50.9% 73.7% 45.0% 63.6% 37.2% 58.9% 39.1% 2003 3/3 1.3 3.3 57.1% 70.2% 50.7% 45.0% 70.0% 61.5% 37.2%
30 2003 4/4 3.8 6.0 58.0% 63.5% 39.4% 37.7% 13.3% 52.7% 32.3% 2004 2/2 1.5 4.0 46.1% 64.8% 47.3% 47.7% 91.7% 55.4% 44.3%
31 2004 1/1 1.0 7.0 54.0% 67.6% 41.4% 62.5% — 55.6% 27.8% 2005 1/1 1.0 3.0 43.4% 65.2% 50.0% 0.0% — 56.6% 27.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 4/4 1.5 1.3 62.2% 69.3% 47.4% 51.2% 45.2% 60.8% 28.2%
Career — 337/375 7.2 5.0 50.8% 74.4% 47.6% 58.6% 39.9% 61.1% 36.6% — 33/39 1.6 3.3 55.5% 64.6% 46.5% 48.8% 40.0% 56.7% 34.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Prinosil Gouichi Motomura
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1992 1584 124.3 -0.94 -0.69 0.944 49.1% -10 +20 — 48.9% -0.08 3–3 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 101.7 +1.25 1993 1465 93.3 -2.63 -2.15 0.483 39.2% +31 — — 0.0% -3.83 — — — +0.15
20 1993 1634 137.4 -2.68 +0.92 0.927 48.1% +22 -94 — 43.4% -0.56 5–9 (36%) 9–7 (56%) 101.8 -2.64 1994 1449 98.0 -2.39 -1.50 0.865 47.1% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.21
21 1994 1632 123.0 -2.23 -1.70 0.869 47.6% -33 -99 +66 42.4% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 102.6 +0.54 1995 1455 106.4 -0.59 +2.06 0.639 42.0% +24 — — 33.3% -1.00 — — — -0.06
22 1995 1709 138.9 +1.36 +0.40 1.046 51.0% -36 -165 +54 53.1% +0.14 5–9 (36%) 8–9 (47%) 99.6 -0.15 1996 1445 98.9 -2.54 +1.70 0.520 40.7% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — +0.04
23 1996 1772 147.8 +0.83 +0.78 1.014 50.5% +51 -272 -46 49.6% +0.12 7–8 (47%) 10–14 (42%) 97.4 -1.73 1997 1426 103.2 -2.90 +0.59 0.986 49.6% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 — — +0.08
24 1997 1631 131.8 -1.59 -0.14 0.905 48.5% +42 -157 — 38.4% -0.59 8–6 (57%) 6–10 (38%) 98.9 -1.03 1998 1448 96.8 -3.58 -3.08 0.662 43.1% +28 — — 45.5% -1.54 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — +0.48
25 1998 1621 133.9 +0.75 -1.34 0.965 49.3% +12 -164 +85 44.9% -0.22 8–7 (53%) 12–13 (48%) 102.2 -0.31 1999 1454 106.1 -1.20 -0.45 0.913 48.4% +43 — — 41.7% -0.50 1–1 1–0 — +0.56
26 1999 1672 136.8 +0.80 -0.84 0.982 49.5% -9 -161 +2 47.7% +0.08 6–4 (60%) 6–8 (43%) 102.8 +0.22 2000 1442 100.5 -0.81 -1.68 0.735 44.4% +42 — — 0.0% -3.11 — — — -0.13
27 2000 1779 133.7 -0.50 -1.27 0.918 48.9% -59 -310 +78 50.5% -0.12 11–4 (73%) 11–5 (69%) 112.7 +0.01 2001 1443 107.2 -2.49 -2.02 0.823 46.4% — — — 20.0% -1.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.03
28 2001 1604 127.5 -3.03 -1.45 0.797 45.9% +13 -202 +186 30.7% -0.91 3–3 (50%) 3–9 (25%) 95.0 -1.97 2002 1433 99.4 +1.42 -0.21 1.369 56.9% — — — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 0–1 — -0.14
29 2002 1592 102.9 -1.30 +0.60 0.952 48.7% — — — 44.4% -0.33 1–0 1–1 — -0.15 2003 1440 105.6 -1.03 -0.28 0.966 49.4% -17 — — 37.5% -0.50 — 0–1 — +0.08
30 2003 1520 96.3 -4.05 -0.39 0.683 42.6% +61 — — 10.0% -2.70 — 0–2 — -0.16 2004 1431 109.3 +0.15 +2.35 0.995 50.2% — — — 60.0% -0.60 0–1 — — -0.20
31 2004 1515 99.3 -2.03 +1.03 0.625 42.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.15 2005 1383 93.9 -4.28 -2.91 0.628 41.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.03
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1405 105.1 -1.87 -2.74 0.719 45.7% +17 — — 30.0% -1.20 1–1 2–0 — +0.46
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1408 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1404 101.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1793 139.5 -0.56 -0.38 0.939 48.9% +8 -123 +64 44.9% -0.27 59–57 (51%) 75–85 (47%) 104.2 -1.67 — 1500 104.6 -1.66 -0.98 0.788 46.0% +25 — — 30.4% -1.40 4–9 (31%) 5–5 (50%) 97.0 +3.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.