H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
David Prinosil vs Henri Leconte H2H: 0-1
Henri Leconte holds a 1–0 lead over David Prinosil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Henri Leconte leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Henri Leconte won the 1993 Wimbledon second round 6-4 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 63
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 1993* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Henri Leconte | 6-4 6-4 6-4 | David Prinosil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Prinosil | #1,091 | #28 | 1,040 | 1,800 | 165 | 208 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Henri Leconte | #1,355 | #5 | 948 | 2,064 | 344 | 242 | 58.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Prinosil | Henri Leconte | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #440 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #29 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1992 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #30 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1993 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #77 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #27 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #130 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #50 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #6 | 1,972 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #21 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 1997 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #89 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 47–19 | 71.2% | #9 | 1,936 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #115 | 1,798 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2000 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #161 | 1,716 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2001 | 7–22 | 24.1% | #132 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #61 | 1,807 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #229 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #101 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | 2003 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,521 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,737 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1063 | 1,515 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #134 | 1,632 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1001 | 1,558 | 0 | 9 |