H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

David Prinosil vs Henri Leconte H2H: 0-1

Henri Leconte holds a 1–0 lead over David Prinosil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Henri Leconte leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Henri Leconte won the 1993 Wimbledon round of 64 6-4 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Prinosil
GER Age 53 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Henri Leconte
FRA Age 63 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Henri Leconte #75 6-4 6-4 6-4 David Prinosil #88 Match data Jun 25, 1993* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Prinosil #1,091 #28 1,040 1,793 165 210 44.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Henri Leconte #1,355 #5 948 2,064 346 244 58.6% 0 0 0 0 9 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Prinosil Henri Leconte
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1980 0–4 0.0% #440 1,461 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1981 3–6 33.3% — 1,481 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1982 31–21 59.6% #29 1,852 0 1
19 1992 9–9 50.0% #125 1,583 0 0 1983 35–23 60.3% #30 1,828 0 1
20 1993 16–25 39.0% #77 1,634 0 0 1984 26–18 59.1% #27 1,867 0 2
21 1994 8–13 38.1% #130 1,632 0 0 1985 44–21 67.7% #16 1,933 0 4
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #50 1,708 0 1 1986 38–14 73.1% #6 1,973 0 6
23 1996 24–24 50.0% #39 1,771 0 2 1987 23–16 59.0% #21 1,844 0 6
24 1997 16–26 38.1% #89 1,630 0 2 1988 48–20 70.6% #9 1,925 0 8
25 1998 20–25 44.4% #78 1,621 0 2 1989 10–11 47.6% #115 1,792 0 8
26 1999 22–23 48.9% #66 1,671 0 2 1990 25–17 59.5% #30 1,797 0 8
27 2000 22–18 55.0% #38 1,779 0 3 1991 8–12 40.0% #161 1,717 0 8
28 2001 7–22 24.1% #132 1,604 0 3 1992 18–16 52.9% #61 1,820 0 8
29 2002 2–2 50.0% #229 1,591 0 3 1993 13–11 54.2% #101 1,840 0 9
30 2003 0–4 0.0% #276 1,520 0 3 1994 16–16 50.0% #94 1,741 0 9
31 2004 0–1 0.0% #1063 1,514 0 3 1995 8–14 36.4% #134 1,635 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 1996 0–4 0.0% #1001 1,560 0 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Prinosil Henri Leconte
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 19 7 26 73.1% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 1992 — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1983 14 8 22 63.6% 16 9 25 64.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
20 1993 9 12 21 42.9% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1984 8 6 14 57.1% 11 6 17 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
21 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1985 10 7 17 58.8% 19 7 26 73.1% 13 4 17 76.5% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 1995 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1986 7 2 9 77.8% 19 4 23 82.6% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 6 9 33.3%
23 1996 13 11 24 54.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 1987 5 5 10 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
24 1997 5 10 15 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 1988 8 5 13 61.5% 24 7 31 77.4% 3 1 4 75.0% 13 7 20 65.0%
25 1998 9 11 20 45.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 7 13 46.2% 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 5 5 10 50.0%
26 1999 7 10 17 41.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1990 4 4 8 50.0% 19 8 27 70.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 2000 6 11 17 35.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 7 2 9 77.8% 1991 1 3 4 25.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2001 4 14 18 22.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 5 11 54.5%
29 2002 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1993 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 1 9 88.9% 3 3 6 50.0%
30 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 3 3 6 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 4 9 55.6%
31 2004 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1995 3 2 5 60.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 63 94 157 40.1% 13 40 53 24.5% 35 26 61 57.4% 54 50 104 51.9% — 85 64 149 57.0% 146 95 241 60.6% 56 29 85 65.9% 59 56 115 51.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 337/375 of David Prinosil's and 120/136 of Henri Leconte's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age David Prinosil Henri Leconte
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1992 16/18 4.7 5.1 51.2% 68.4% 46.2% 58.7% 43.7% 57.9% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 38/41 5.7 5.8 48.0% 70.6% 46.8% 53.3% 40.1% 58.2% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1994 18/21 8.6 7.1 44.8% 77.2% 45.0% 65.0% 33.6% 59.6% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1995 37/37 8.6 5.5 50.5% 78.2% 48.5% 63.9% 44.6% 63.5% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1996 43/48 7.3 4.0 53.1% 75.6% 49.1% 64.9% 39.1% 62.9% 37.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1997 38/42 6.6 3.8 50.7% 72.9% 47.9% 58.1% 42.5% 60.3% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1998 39/45 8.6 5.4 50.7% 78.2% 47.8% 51.6% 43.1% 63.0% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1999 40/45 7.2 4.4 50.7% 76.0% 50.4% 53.9% 37.6% 63.3% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 33/40 9.1 5.4 52.5% 75.0% 46.4% 65.6% 39.4% 61.4% 35.4% 1991 19/20 7.2 5.3 46.5% 74.1% 50.9% 60.1% 48.7% 61.7% 39.2%
28 2001 26/29 5.4 4.2 52.8% 69.9% 45.7% 55.7% 37.5% 58.2% 33.3% 1992 27/34 7.6 3.7 52.3% 77.5% 52.8% 65.7% 45.7% 65.7% 40.2%
29 2002 4/4 6.3 7.3 50.9% 73.7% 45.0% 63.6% 37.2% 58.9% 39.1% 1993 21/24 5.8 5.6 50.8% 73.6% 49.4% 62.4% 39.5% 61.8% 35.7%
30 2003 4/4 3.8 6.0 58.0% 63.5% 39.4% 37.7% 13.3% 52.7% 32.3% 1994 29/32 5.4 4.2 48.1% 74.7% 51.4% 58.2% 43.0% 62.6% 39.6%
31 2004 1/1 1.0 7.0 54.0% 67.6% 41.4% 62.5% — 55.6% 27.8% 1995 21/22 5.0 4.6 50.4% 67.4% 47.9% 51.5% 36.6% 57.8% 35.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 3/4 3.3 5.3 40.9% 67.5% 44.9% 52.1% 25.0% 53.7% 33.1%
Career — 337/375 7.2 5.0 50.8% 74.4% 47.6% 58.6% 39.9% 61.1% 36.6% — 120/590 6.1 4.6 49.5% 73.6% 50.5% 59.6% 42.3% 62.0% 38.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Prinosil Henri Leconte
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1462 107.0 — — — — — — — 18.2% -2.64 0–1 0–1 — -0.03
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1481 112.5 — — — — — — +123 40.7% -0.74 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.37
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1853 153.1 — — — — +3 -263 -281 53.3% +0.41 11–6 (65%) 10–9 (53%) — -1.69
19 1992 1584 124.3 -0.94 -0.69 0.944 49.1% -10 +20 — 48.9% -0.08 3–3 (50%) 3–4 (43%) — +1.25 1983 1829 160.3 — — — — +21 -60 — 57.7% +0.77 12–9 (57%) 4–9 (31%) — -5.74
20 1993 1634 137.4 -2.68 +0.92 0.927 48.1% +22 -94 — 43.4% -0.56 5–9 (36%) 9–7 (56%) — -2.64 1984 1867 156.9 — — — — +15 -26 — 57.7% +0.57 7–7 (50%) 7–7 (50%) — -2.73
21 1994 1632 123.0 -2.23 -1.70 0.869 47.6% -33 -99 +66 42.4% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) — +0.54 1985 1934 153.7 — — — — -90 -6 -68 65.9% +1.15 9–7 (56%) 11–15 (42%) — -0.38
22 1995 1709 138.9 +1.36 +0.40 1.046 51.0% -36 -165 +54 53.1% +0.14 5–9 (36%) 8–9 (47%) — -0.15 1986 1973 155.3 — — — — -103 +24 -3 71.7% +1.39 6–5 (55%) 9–5 (64%) — -1.49
23 1996 1772 147.8 +0.83 +0.78 1.014 50.5% +51 -272 -46 49.6% +0.12 7–8 (47%) 10–14 (42%) — -1.73 1987 1844 139.2 — — — — +4 +40 +96 58.2% +0.56 8–7 (53%) 13–10 (57%) — +1.37
24 1997 1631 131.8 -1.59 -0.14 0.905 48.5% +42 -157 — 38.4% -0.59 8–6 (57%) 6–10 (38%) — -1.03 1988 1925 151.1 — — — — -40 +57 -10 63.2% +0.85 14–1 (93%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.80
25 1998 1621 133.9 +0.75 -1.34 0.965 49.3% +12 -164 +85 44.9% -0.22 8–7 (53%) 12–13 (48%) — -0.31 1989 1792 131.0 — — — — -11 +138 — 46.9% -0.02 5–3 (63%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.39
26 1999 1672 136.8 +0.80 -0.84 0.982 49.5% -9 -161 +2 47.7% +0.08 6–4 (60%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.22 1990 1797 147.6 — — — — -76 +181 +71 61.2% +0.68 7–9 (44%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.20
27 2000 1779 133.7 -0.50 -1.27 0.918 48.9% -59 -310 +78 50.5% -0.12 11–4 (73%) 11–5 (69%) — +0.01 1991 1717 126.0 +1.97 -1.02 1.023 50.6% -76 +146 +147 51.0% +0.43 2–6 (25%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.35
28 2001 1604 127.5 -3.03 -1.45 0.797 45.9% +13 -202 +186 30.7% -0.91 3–3 (50%) 3–9 (25%) — -1.97 1992 1821 151.3 +3.52 +2.24 1.171 52.9% -59 -12 +50 58.9% +0.86 6–5 (55%) 9–7 (56%) — -1.65
29 2002 1592 102.9 -1.30 +0.60 0.952 48.7% — — — 44.4% -0.33 1–0 1–1 — -0.15 1993 1841 136.9 +1.37 -0.47 0.935 48.7% -131 -60 +120 51.5% +0.06 7–4 (64%) 5–3 (63%) — -3.12
30 2003 1520 96.3 -4.05 -0.39 0.683 42.6% +61 — — 10.0% -2.70 — 0–2 — -0.16 1994 1742 142.8 +1.00 +2.00 1.059 51.0% -13 -31 +182 54.1% +0.50 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.94
31 2004 1515 99.3 -2.03 +1.03 0.625 42.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.15 1995 1636 122.3 -2.33 -1.40 0.837 46.9% +104 +2 +161 38.5% -0.85 3–6 (33%) 4–2 (67%) — -1.19
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1561 92.6 -3.49 -2.03 0.714 43.1% — — — 10.0% -3.10 0–1 1–0 — +0.47
Career — 1793 139.5 -0.56 -0.38 0.939 48.9% +8 -123 +64 44.9% -0.27 59–57 (51%) 75–85 (47%) 104.2 -1.67 — 2064 155.4 +1.09 +0.45 1.001 50.0% -27 +11 +40 58.0% +0.61 103–86 (54%) 107–100 (52%) 101.5 -3.37

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.