H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

David Prinosil vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 1-0

David Prinosil holds a 1–0 lead over Hyung-Taik Lee in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Prinosil leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, David Prinosil won the 2001 Wimbledon round of 128 6-7(5) 6-2 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Prinosil
GER Age 53 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Hyung-Taik Lee
KOR Age 50 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
David Prinosil #46 6-7(5) 6-2 6-4 6-4 Hyung-Taik Lee #64 Match data Jun 27, 2001* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Prinosil #1,091 #28 1,040 1,793 165 210 44.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Hyung-Taik Lee #1,256 #36 864 1,798 121 156 43.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Prinosil Hyung-Taik Lee
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1992 9–9 50.0% #125 1,583 0 0 1995 1–1 50.0% #241 1,509 0 0
20 1993 16–25 39.0% #77 1,634 0 0 1996 0–1 0.0% #283 1,497 0 0
21 1994 8–13 38.1% #130 1,632 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #50 1,708 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 1996 24–24 50.0% #39 1,771 0 2 1999 1–2 33.3% #191 1,497 0 0
24 1997 16–26 38.1% #89 1,630 0 2 2000 7–5 58.3% #90 1,642 0 0
25 1998 20–25 44.4% #78 1,621 0 2 2001 9–19 32.1% #116 1,559 0 0
26 1999 22–23 48.9% #66 1,671 0 2 2002 11–14 44.0% #87 1,625 0 0
27 2000 22–18 55.0% #38 1,779 0 3 2003 18–23 43.9% #56 1,606 0 1
28 2001 7–22 24.1% #132 1,604 0 3 2004 16–16 50.0% #59 1,693 0 1
29 2002 2–2 50.0% #229 1,591 0 3 2005 10–19 34.5% #107 1,625 0 1
30 2003 0–4 0.0% #276 1,520 0 3 2006 18–15 54.5% #49 1,736 0 1
31 2004 0–1 0.0% #1063 1,514 0 3 2007 21–23 47.7% #51 1,769 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2008 9–17 34.6% #107 1,611 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2009 0–1 0.0% #871 1,580 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Prinosil Hyung-Taik Lee
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1992 — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 9 12 21 42.9% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1995 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1996 13 11 24 54.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 1999 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 1997 5 10 15 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 2000 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1998 9 11 20 45.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 7 13 46.2% 2001 3 14 17 17.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 1999 7 10 17 41.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2002 6 9 15 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
27 2000 6 11 17 35.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 7 2 9 77.8% 2003 16 14 30 53.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2001 4 14 18 22.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 10 14 24 41.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
29 2002 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2005 5 11 16 31.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 14 11 25 56.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2004 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 15 15 30 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 6 10 16 37.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 63 94 157 40.1% 13 40 53 24.5% 35 26 61 57.4% 54 50 104 51.9% — 84 107 191 44.0% 20 27 47 42.6% 17 19 36 47.2% 0 3 3 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 337/375 of David Prinosil's and 199/206 of Hyung-Taik Lee's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age David Prinosil Hyung-Taik Lee
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1992 16/18 4.7 5.1 51.2% 68.4% 46.2% 58.7% 43.7% 57.9% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 38/41 5.7 5.8 48.0% 70.6% 46.8% 53.3% 40.1% 58.2% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1994 18/21 8.6 7.1 44.8% 77.2% 45.0% 65.0% 33.6% 59.6% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1995 37/37 8.6 5.5 50.5% 78.2% 48.5% 63.9% 44.6% 63.5% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1996 43/48 7.3 4.0 53.1% 75.6% 49.1% 64.9% 39.1% 62.9% 37.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1997 38/42 6.6 3.8 50.7% 72.9% 47.9% 58.1% 42.5% 60.3% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1998 39/45 8.6 5.4 50.7% 78.2% 47.8% 51.6% 43.1% 63.0% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1999 40/45 7.2 4.4 50.7% 76.0% 50.4% 53.9% 37.6% 63.3% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 33/40 9.1 5.4 52.5% 75.0% 46.4% 65.6% 39.4% 61.4% 35.4% 2003 40/41 3.5 2.0 63.5% 68.1% 51.1% 53.0% 35.7% 62.0% 38.2%
28 2001 26/29 5.4 4.2 52.8% 69.9% 45.7% 55.7% 37.5% 58.2% 33.3% 2004 29/32 3.4 2.3 64.4% 69.4% 52.1% 53.8% 44.6% 63.6% 36.2%
29 2002 4/4 6.3 7.3 50.9% 73.7% 45.0% 63.6% 37.2% 58.9% 39.1% 2005 28/29 3.4 2.3 61.0% 68.0% 51.0% 54.1% 37.2% 61.8% 34.9%
30 2003 4/4 3.8 6.0 58.0% 63.5% 39.4% 37.7% 13.3% 52.7% 32.3% 2006 32/33 3.7 1.6 66.9% 68.9% 52.8% 60.1% 48.4% 63.9% 37.4%
31 2004 1/1 1.0 7.0 54.0% 67.6% 41.4% 62.5% — 55.6% 27.8% 2007 44/44 3.0 1.6 63.0% 70.3% 52.7% 53.0% 31.2% 64.0% 37.1%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 25/26 2.8 2.5 63.8% 65.5% 48.3% 52.8% 39.7% 59.3% 36.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 1/1 0.0 3.0 55.6% 60.0% 50.0% 63.6% 33.3% 55.6% 37.8%
Career — 337/375 7.2 5.0 50.8% 74.4% 47.6% 58.6% 39.9% 61.1% 36.6% — 199/277 3.3 2.0 63.7% 68.6% 51.5% 54.4% 38.7% 62.6% 36.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Prinosil Hyung-Taik Lee
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1992 1584 124.3 -0.94 -0.69 0.944 49.1% -10 +20 — 48.9% -0.08 3–3 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 101.7 +1.25 1995 1510 105.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–0 — +0.15
20 1993 1634 137.4 -2.68 +0.92 0.927 48.1% +22 -94 — 43.4% -0.56 5–9 (36%) 9–7 (56%) 101.8 -2.64 1996 1497 100.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.10
21 1994 1632 123.0 -2.23 -1.70 0.869 47.6% -33 -99 +66 42.4% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 102.6 +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1995 1709 138.9 +1.36 +0.40 1.046 51.0% -36 -165 +54 53.1% +0.14 5–9 (36%) 8–9 (47%) 99.6 -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1996 1772 147.8 +0.83 +0.78 1.014 50.5% +51 -272 -46 49.6% +0.12 7–8 (47%) 10–14 (42%) 97.4 -1.73 1999 1498 110.3 — — — — — — — 37.5% 0.00 1–1 0–2 — +0.19
24 1997 1631 131.8 -1.59 -0.14 0.905 48.5% +42 -157 — 38.4% -0.59 8–6 (57%) 6–10 (38%) 98.9 -1.03 2000 1643 126.3 — — — — +16 — — 55.2% +0.38 0–1 4–2 (67%) — +0.44
25 1998 1621 133.9 +0.75 -1.34 0.965 49.3% +12 -164 +85 44.9% -0.22 8–7 (53%) 12–13 (48%) 102.2 -0.31 2001 1560 126.2 — — — — -10 +45 — 37.1% -0.71 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 100.8 -0.31
26 1999 1672 136.8 +0.80 -0.84 0.982 49.5% -9 -161 +2 47.7% +0.08 6–4 (60%) 6–8 (43%) 102.8 +0.22 2002 1626 130.4 — — — — -62 -53 +45 47.8% -0.10 3–6 (33%) 5–4 (56%) 99.5 -0.15
27 2000 1779 133.7 -0.50 -1.27 0.918 48.9% -59 -310 +78 50.5% -0.12 11–4 (73%) 11–5 (69%) 112.7 +0.01 2003 1607 137.1 +0.37 +1.31 1.005 49.8% +38 -41 -12 43.6% -0.18 6–7 (46%) 5–12 (29%) 95.9 -1.24
28 2001 1604 127.5 -3.03 -1.45 0.797 45.9% +13 -202 +186 30.7% -0.91 3–3 (50%) 3–9 (25%) 95.0 -1.97 2004 1694 132.8 0.00 +0.22 0.996 50.1% -22 -76 +2 51.3% -0.10 5–8 (38%) 7–6 (54%) 99.5 -0.09
29 2002 1592 102.9 -1.30 +0.60 0.952 48.7% — — — 44.4% -0.33 1–0 1–1 — -0.15 2005 1626 129.9 -0.24 -0.93 0.913 48.4% -33 +14 +61 39.7% -0.74 3–6 (33%) 3–7 (30%) 94.6 -1.85
30 2003 1520 96.3 -4.05 -0.39 0.683 42.6% +61 — — 10.0% -2.70 — 0–2 — -0.16 2006 1737 133.5 +1.59 +0.54 1.037 50.7% -41 — -11 52.3% +0.01 8–4 (67%) 10–5 (67%) 110.0 -0.52
31 2004 1515 99.3 -2.03 +1.03 0.625 42.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.15 2007 1770 137.1 +0.81 +0.33 1.029 50.3% +8 -188 -69 47.7% -0.11 5–7 (42%) 9–14 (39%) 97.7 +0.89
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1611 130.0 -2.82 -0.10 0.900 48.3% +78 -31 — 43.8% -0.59 3–5 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 98.7 +0.14
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1580 100.2 -0.70 -4.74 0.851 47.1% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.05
Career — 1793 139.5 -0.56 -0.38 0.939 48.9% +8 -123 +64 44.9% -0.27 59–57 (51%) 75–85 (47%) 104.2 -1.67 — 1799 138.7 +0.12 +0.29 0.985 49.7% -2 -43 +2 45.8% -0.27 37–52 (42%) 54–58 (48%) 99.2 -0.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.