H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

David Prinosil vs Jacco Eltingh H2H: 1-0

David Prinosil holds a 1–0 lead over Jacco Eltingh in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Prinosil leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, David Prinosil won the 1994 Wimbledon round of 64 3-6 6-2 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Prinosil
GER Age 53 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Jacco Eltingh
NED Age 56 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
David Prinosil #117 3-6 6-2 6-3 6-4 Jacco Eltingh #47 Match data Jun 24, 1994* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Prinosil #1,091 #28 1,040 1,793 165 210 44.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Jacco Eltingh #1,378 #19 1,332 1,876 124 141 46.8% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Prinosil Jacco Eltingh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1989 0–1 0.0% #276 1,490 0 0
19 1992 9–9 50.0% #125 1,583 0 0 1990 3–2 60.0% #128 1,525 0 0
20 1993 16–25 39.0% #77 1,634 0 0 1991 12–24 33.3% #114 1,510 0 0
21 1994 8–13 38.1% #130 1,632 0 0 1992 18–22 45.0% #78 1,591 0 1
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #50 1,708 0 1 1993 22–26 45.8% #63 1,634 0 2
23 1996 24–24 50.0% #39 1,771 0 2 1994 40–23 63.5% #23 1,829 0 4
24 1997 16–26 38.1% #89 1,630 0 2 1995 24–26 48.0% #43 1,772 0 4
25 1998 20–25 44.4% #78 1,621 0 2 1996 4–12 25.0% #307 1,617 0 4
26 1999 22–23 48.9% #66 1,671 0 2 1997 1–5 16.7% #604 1,557 0 4
27 2000 22–18 55.0% #38 1,779 0 3 — — — — — — —
28 2001 7–22 24.1% #132 1,604 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 2002 2–2 50.0% #229 1,591 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 2003 0–4 0.0% #276 1,520 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 2004 0–1 0.0% #1063 1,514 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Prinosil Jacco Eltingh
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1992 — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1990 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
20 1993 9 12 21 42.9% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1991 4 12 16 25.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1992 4 7 11 36.4% 7 8 15 46.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 5 7 28.6%
22 1995 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1993 10 13 23 43.5% 8 6 14 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
23 1996 13 11 24 54.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 1994 10 8 18 55.6% 11 7 18 61.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 14 5 19 73.7%
24 1997 5 10 15 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 1995 5 9 14 35.7% 5 7 12 41.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 7 13 46.2%
25 1998 9 11 20 45.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 7 13 46.2% 1996 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1999 7 10 17 41.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1997 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 2000 6 11 17 35.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 4 14 18 22.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 63 94 157 40.1% 13 40 53 24.5% 35 26 61 57.4% 54 50 104 51.9% — 37 59 96 38.5% 34 36 70 48.6% 26 19 45 57.8% 27 27 54 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 337/375 of David Prinosil's and 221/259 of Jacco Eltingh's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age David Prinosil Jacco Eltingh
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1992 16/18 4.7 5.1 51.2% 68.4% 46.2% 58.7% 43.7% 57.9% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 38/41 5.7 5.8 48.0% 70.6% 46.8% 53.3% 40.1% 58.2% 38.8% 1991 33/36 7.1 3.6 60.0% 67.4% 46.4% 49.1% 34.5% 59.1% 31.9%
21 1994 18/21 8.6 7.1 44.8% 77.2% 45.0% 65.0% 33.6% 59.6% 35.1% 1992 37/40 6.7 2.6 62.9% 72.4% 50.1% 68.9% 36.1% 64.2% 34.0%
22 1995 37/37 8.6 5.5 50.5% 78.2% 48.5% 63.9% 44.6% 63.5% 38.1% 1993 43/48 6.0 3.5 63.0% 72.6% 48.7% 58.3% 35.2% 63.5% 33.4%
23 1996 43/48 7.3 4.0 53.1% 75.6% 49.1% 64.9% 39.1% 62.9% 37.6% 1994 49/63 9.5 4.0 63.3% 76.3% 48.7% 61.2% 35.3% 66.1% 34.2%
24 1997 38/42 6.6 3.8 50.7% 72.9% 47.9% 58.1% 42.5% 60.3% 36.0% 1995 43/50 8.1 5.0 61.2% 74.7% 49.8% 61.9% 42.9% 65.0% 34.0%
25 1998 39/45 8.6 5.4 50.7% 78.2% 47.8% 51.6% 43.1% 63.0% 35.7% 1996 11/16 6.4 4.3 56.0% 74.8% 47.9% 50.6% 38.3% 63.0% 32.2%
26 1999 40/45 7.2 4.4 50.7% 76.0% 50.4% 53.9% 37.6% 63.3% 36.1% 1997 5/6 11.4 5.4 61.5% 74.9% 50.4% 56.3% 40.6% 65.6% 32.1%
27 2000 33/40 9.1 5.4 52.5% 75.0% 46.4% 65.6% 39.4% 61.4% 35.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 26/29 5.4 4.2 52.8% 69.9% 45.7% 55.7% 37.5% 58.2% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 4/4 6.3 7.3 50.9% 73.7% 45.0% 63.6% 37.2% 58.9% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 4/4 3.8 6.0 58.0% 63.5% 39.4% 37.7% 13.3% 52.7% 32.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 1/1 1.0 7.0 54.0% 67.6% 41.4% 62.5% — 55.6% 27.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 337/375 7.2 5.0 50.8% 74.4% 47.6% 58.6% 39.9% 61.1% 36.6% — 221/265 7.6 3.8 61.9% 73.2% 48.8% 59.6% 37.0% 63.9% 33.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Prinosil Jacco Eltingh
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1490 100.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.02
19 1992 1584 124.3 -0.94 -0.69 0.944 49.1% -10 +20 — 48.9% -0.08 3–3 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 101.7 +1.25 1990 1525 104.0 — — — — +51 — — 61.5% +0.85 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 96.6 +0.66
20 1993 1634 137.4 -2.68 +0.92 0.927 48.1% +22 -94 — 43.4% -0.56 5–9 (36%) 9–7 (56%) 101.8 -2.64 1991 1510 114.5 -1.53 -5.09 0.781 45.9% -36 +33 +133 35.1% -1.07 4–5 (44%) 7–5 (58%) 102.4 +1.30
21 1994 1632 123.0 -2.23 -1.70 0.869 47.6% -33 -99 +66 42.4% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 102.6 +0.54 1992 1591 132.8 +2.27 -3.70 0.949 49.5% -101 +22 +152 44.1% -0.41 8–8 (50%) 10–10 (50%) 105.3 -1.05
22 1995 1709 138.9 +1.36 +0.40 1.046 51.0% -36 -165 +54 53.1% +0.14 5–9 (36%) 8–9 (47%) 99.6 -0.15 1993 1635 126.1 +1.74 -3.99 0.916 48.5% -80 +16 +85 44.6% -0.42 5–2 (71%) 10–7 (59%) 106.8 -0.27
23 1996 1772 147.8 +0.83 +0.78 1.014 50.5% +51 -272 -46 49.6% +0.12 7–8 (47%) 10–14 (42%) 97.4 -1.73 1994 1829 139.4 +3.57 -2.91 1.009 50.3% -35 -81 -105 60.4% +0.25 11–9 (55%) 33–10 (77%) 113.1 +2.23
24 1997 1631 131.8 -1.59 -0.14 0.905 48.5% +42 -157 — 38.4% -0.59 8–6 (57%) 6–10 (38%) 98.9 -1.03 1995 1772 145.8 +3.15 -2.97 0.973 50.2% -44 -33 +79 50.7% +0.03 7–8 (47%) 14–10 (58%) 102.1 -1.27
25 1998 1621 133.9 +0.75 -1.34 0.965 49.3% +12 -164 +85 44.9% -0.22 8–7 (53%) 12–13 (48%) 102.2 -0.31 1996 1618 118.1 +0.37 -3.11 0.871 47.9% +14 — +178 32.5% -1.05 1–4 (20%) 5–5 (50%) 94.7 -0.29
26 1999 1672 136.8 +0.80 -0.84 0.982 49.5% -9 -161 +2 47.7% +0.08 6–4 (60%) 6–8 (43%) 102.8 +0.22 1997 1557 105.0 +1.00 -1.87 0.932 48.8% +19 — — 31.3% -0.50 0–2 1–5 (17%) — +0.30
27 2000 1779 133.7 -0.50 -1.27 0.918 48.9% -59 -310 +78 50.5% -0.12 11–4 (73%) 11–5 (69%) 112.7 +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 1604 127.5 -3.03 -1.45 0.797 45.9% +13 -202 +186 30.7% -0.91 3–3 (50%) 3–9 (25%) 95.0 -1.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 1592 102.9 -1.30 +0.60 0.952 48.7% — — — 44.4% -0.33 1–0 1–1 — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 1520 96.3 -4.05 -0.39 0.683 42.6% +61 — — 10.0% -2.70 — 0–2 — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 1515 99.3 -2.03 +1.03 0.625 42.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1793 139.5 -0.56 -0.38 0.939 48.9% +8 -123 +64 44.9% -0.27 59–57 (51%) 75–85 (47%) 104.2 -1.67 — 1876 135.5 +1.94 -3.58 0.927 49.0% -45 -14 +74 47.3% -0.28 37–40 (48%) 81–56 (59%) 108.3 +0.60

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.