H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

David Prinosil vs Jim Thomas H2H: 1-0

David Prinosil holds a 1–0 lead over Jim Thomas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Prinosil leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Prinosil won the 1999 U.S. Pro Tennis Championships round of 32 6-2 6-1.

GER Age 53 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 0
1 main draw meetings
USA Age 51 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
David Prinosil #52 6-2 6-1 Jim Thomas #421 Match data Aug 26, 1999* R32 U.S. Pro Tennis Championships ATP World Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Prinosil #1,091 #28 1,040 1,793 165 210 44.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Jim Thomas #1,284 #288 127 1,500 0 3 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Prinosil Jim Thomas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1992 9–9 50.0% #125 1,583 0 0
20 1993 16–25 39.0% #77 1,634 0 0
21 1994 8–13 38.1% #130 1,632 0 0
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #50 1,708 0 1
23 1996 24–24 50.0% #39 1,771 0 2
24 1997 16–26 38.1% #89 1,630 0 2 1999 0–1 0.0% #408 1,491 0 0
25 1998 20–25 44.4% #78 1,621 0 2 2000 0–1 0.0% #661 1,478 0 0
26 1999 22–23 48.9% #66 1,671 0 2 2001 0–1 0.0% #628 1,466 0 0
27 2000 22–18 55.0% #38 1,779 0 3
28 2001 7–22 24.1% #132 1,604 0 3
29 2002 2–2 50.0% #229 1,591 0 3
30 2003 0–4 0.0% #276 1,520 0 3
31 2004 0–1 0.0% #1063 1,514 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Prinosil Jim Thomas
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1992 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
20 1993 9 12 21 42.9% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
21 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 1995 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 1996 13 11 24 54.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 11 7 18 61.1%
24 1997 5 10 15 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 1999 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1998 9 11 20 45.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 7 13 46.2% 2000 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1999 7 10 17 41.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2001 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2000 6 11 17 35.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 7 2 9 77.8%
28 2001 4 14 18 22.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2002 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2004 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 63 94 157 40.1% 13 40 53 24.5% 35 26 61 57.4% 54 50 104 51.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Prinosil Jim Thomas
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1992 1584 124.3 -0.94 -0.69 0.944 49.1% -10 +20 48.9% -0.08 3–3 (50%) 3–4 (43%) +1.25
20 1993 1634 137.4 -2.68 +0.92 0.927 48.1% +22 -94 43.4% -0.56 5–9 (36%) 9–7 (56%) -2.64
21 1994 1632 123.0 -2.23 -1.70 0.869 47.6% -33 -99 +66 42.4% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) +0.54
22 1995 1709 138.9 +1.36 +0.40 1.046 51.0% -36 -165 +54 53.1% +0.14 5–9 (36%) 8–9 (47%) -0.15
23 1996 1772 147.8 +0.83 +0.78 1.014 50.5% +51 -272 -46 49.6% +0.12 7–8 (47%) 10–14 (42%) -1.73
24 1997 1631 131.8 -1.59 -0.14 0.905 48.5% +42 -157 38.4% -0.59 8–6 (57%) 6–10 (38%) -1.03 1999 1491 97.5 0.0% -4.50 +0.01
25 1998 1621 133.9 +0.75 -1.34 0.965 49.3% +12 -164 +85 44.9% -0.22 8–7 (53%) 12–13 (48%) -0.31 2000 1479 99.2 0.0% -3.00 +0.10
26 1999 1672 136.8 +0.80 -0.84 0.982 49.5% -9 -161 +2 47.7% +0.08 6–4 (60%) 6–8 (43%) +0.22 2001 1467 96.9 0.0% -3.50 +0.04
27 2000 1779 133.7 -0.50 -1.27 0.918 48.9% -59 -310 +78 50.5% -0.12 11–4 (73%) 11–5 (69%) +0.01
28 2001 1604 127.5 -3.03 -1.45 0.797 45.9% +13 -202 +186 30.7% -0.91 3–3 (50%) 3–9 (25%) -1.97
29 2002 1592 102.9 -1.30 +0.60 0.952 48.7% 44.4% -0.33 1–0 1–1 -0.15
30 2003 1520 96.3 -4.05 -0.39 0.683 42.6% +61 10.0% -2.70 0–2 -0.16
31 2004 1515 99.3 -2.03 +1.03 0.625 42.7% 0.0% -3.00 -0.15
32 2007 1444 102.6
33 2008 1363 88.2
Career 1793 139.5 -0.56 -0.38 0.939 48.9% +8 -123 +64 44.9% -0.27 59–57 (51%) 75–85 (47%) 104.2 -1.67 1500 93.1 0.0% -3.67 +5.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.