H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
David Prinosil vs Lars Burgsmuller H2H: 0-2
Lars Burgsmuller holds a 2–0 lead over David Prinosil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lars Burgsmuller leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lars Burgsmuller won the 2001 Roland Garros first round 5-7 6-2 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 50
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2001* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Lars Burgsmuller | 5-7 6-2 6-4 7-5 | David Prinosil | Match data |
| Mar 23, 1996* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Lars Burgsmuller | 3-6 6-4 6-1 | David Prinosil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Prinosil | #1,091 | #28 | 1,040 | 1,800 | 165 | 208 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Lars Burgsmuller | #1,129 | #65 | 596 | 1,747 | 87 | 149 | 36.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Prinosil | Lars Burgsmuller | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #162 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #77 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #145 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #130 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #50 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #134 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #134 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #89 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #178 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #83 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2000 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #76 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2001 | 7–22 | 24.1% | #132 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #100 | 1,533 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #229 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #141 | 1,462 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2003 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,521 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #177 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1063 | 1,515 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #426 | 1,426 | 0 | 1 |