H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
David Prinosil vs M. Goellner H2H: 0-1
M. Goellner holds a 1–0 lead over David Prinosil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, M. Goellner leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, M. Goellner won the 1995 Wimbledon first round 6-4 6-7(7) 4-6 6-3 13-11.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 55
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 1995* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | M. Goellner | 6-4 6-7(7) 4-6 6-3 13-11 | David Prinosil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Prinosil | #1,091 | #28 | 1,040 | 1,800 | 165 | 208 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| M. Goellner | #1,172 | #26 | 1,072 | 1,841 | 152 | 188 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Prinosil | M. Goellner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1992 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #77 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #130 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #50 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #32 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #79 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1997 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #89 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #78 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #53 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 22–34 | 39.3% | #51 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2000 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 11–25 | 30.6% | #118 | 1,592 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2001 | 7–22 | 24.1% | #132 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #324 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #229 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #189 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2003 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,521 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #176 | 1,542 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1063 | 1,515 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #311 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |