H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

David Prinosil vs Mark Koevermans H2H: 0-1

Mark Koevermans holds a 1–0 lead over David Prinosil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mark Koevermans leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mark Koevermans won the 1992 Casablanca round of 16 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Prinosil
GER Age 53 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Mark Koevermans
NED Age 58 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mark Koevermans #88 6-3 6-3 David Prinosil #209 Match data Mar 20, 1992* R16 Casablanca ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Prinosil #1,091 #28 1,040 1,793 165 210 44.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Mark Koevermans #753 #37 712 1,777 66 81 44.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Prinosil Mark Koevermans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1992 9–9 50.0% #125 1,583 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1993 16–25 39.0% #77 1,634 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #139 1,493 0 0
21 1994 8–13 38.1% #130 1,632 0 0 1989 12–11 52.2% #63 1,634 0 0
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #50 1,708 0 1 1990 26–19 57.8% #48 1,753 0 1
23 1996 24–24 50.0% #39 1,771 0 2 1991 16–25 39.0% #71 1,597 0 1
24 1997 16–26 38.1% #89 1,630 0 2 1992 12–20 37.5% #139 1,545 0 1
25 1998 20–25 44.4% #78 1,621 0 2 1993 0–5 0.0% #412 1,486 0 1
26 1999 22–23 48.9% #66 1,671 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 2000 22–18 55.0% #38 1,779 0 3 — — — — — — —
28 2001 7–22 24.1% #132 1,604 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 2002 2–2 50.0% #229 1,591 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 2003 0–4 0.0% #276 1,520 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 2004 0–1 0.0% #1063 1,514 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Prinosil Mark Koevermans
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1992 — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 9 12 21 42.9% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1988 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1989 5 4 9 55.6% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1%
22 1995 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1990 7 5 12 58.3% 15 9 24 62.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
23 1996 13 11 24 54.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 1991 4 8 12 33.3% 12 12 24 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
24 1997 5 10 15 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 1992 1 5 6 16.7% 11 13 24 45.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1998 9 11 20 45.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 7 13 46.2% 1993 — — — — 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1999 7 10 17 41.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 6 11 17 35.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 4 14 18 22.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 63 94 157 40.1% 13 40 53 24.5% 35 26 61 57.4% 54 50 104 51.9% — 17 22 39 43.6% 41 44 85 48.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 12 17 29.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 337/375 of David Prinosil's and 68/78 of Mark Koevermans's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age David Prinosil Mark Koevermans
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1992 16/18 4.7 5.1 51.2% 68.4% 46.2% 58.7% 43.7% 57.9% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 38/41 5.7 5.8 48.0% 70.6% 46.8% 53.3% 40.1% 58.2% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1994 18/21 8.6 7.1 44.8% 77.2% 45.0% 65.0% 33.6% 59.6% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1995 37/37 8.6 5.5 50.5% 78.2% 48.5% 63.9% 44.6% 63.5% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1996 43/48 7.3 4.0 53.1% 75.6% 49.1% 64.9% 39.1% 62.9% 37.6% 1991 39/41 3.0 2.0 53.9% 68.7% 44.7% 57.3% 41.1% 57.7% 39.6%
24 1997 38/42 6.6 3.8 50.7% 72.9% 47.9% 58.1% 42.5% 60.3% 36.0% 1992 24/32 3.5 1.7 55.8% 68.5% 49.8% 48.5% 39.0% 59.6% 37.8%
25 1998 39/45 8.6 5.4 50.7% 78.2% 47.8% 51.6% 43.1% 63.0% 35.7% 1993 5/5 3.0 2.2 58.2% 56.0% 43.9% 43.0% 36.6% 51.0% 33.8%
26 1999 40/45 7.2 4.4 50.7% 76.0% 50.4% 53.9% 37.6% 63.3% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 33/40 9.1 5.4 52.5% 75.0% 46.4% 65.6% 39.4% 61.4% 35.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 26/29 5.4 4.2 52.8% 69.9% 45.7% 55.7% 37.5% 58.2% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 4/4 6.3 7.3 50.9% 73.7% 45.0% 63.6% 37.2% 58.9% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 4/4 3.8 6.0 58.0% 63.5% 39.4% 37.7% 13.3% 52.7% 32.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 1/1 1.0 7.0 54.0% 67.6% 41.4% 62.5% — 55.6% 27.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 337/375 7.2 5.0 50.8% 74.4% 47.6% 58.6% 39.9% 61.1% 36.6% — 68/147 3.2 1.9 54.9% 67.7% 46.5% 53.1% 40.0% 57.8% 38.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Prinosil Mark Koevermans
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1992 1584 124.3 -0.94 -0.69 0.944 49.1% -10 +20 — 48.9% -0.08 3–3 (50%) 3–4 (43%) — +1.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 1634 137.4 -2.68 +0.92 0.927 48.1% +22 -94 — 43.4% -0.56 5–9 (36%) 9–7 (56%) — -2.64 1988 1493 106.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 1–1 — -0.10
21 1994 1632 123.0 -2.23 -1.70 0.869 47.6% -33 -99 +66 42.4% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) — +0.54 1989 1634 132.7 — — — — +3 -82 — 50.0% +0.11 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.70
22 1995 1709 138.9 +1.36 +0.40 1.046 51.0% -36 -165 +54 53.1% +0.14 5–9 (36%) 8–9 (47%) — -0.15 1990 1754 136.3 — — — — -104 +4 -109 52.9% +0.28 13–5 (72%) 6–10 (38%) — +1.01
23 1996 1772 147.8 +0.83 +0.78 1.014 50.5% +51 -272 -46 49.6% +0.12 7–8 (47%) 10–14 (42%) — -1.73 1991 1597 132.1 -2.18 +0.19 0.936 48.7% -42 +156 — 43.1% -0.42 3–10 (23%) 3–7 (30%) — +0.74
24 1997 1631 131.8 -1.59 -0.14 0.905 48.5% +42 -157 — 38.4% -0.59 8–6 (57%) 6–10 (38%) — -1.03 1992 1546 118.8 -1.22 -1.57 0.936 48.5% -47 +137 — 40.0% -0.41 4–8 (33%) 1–7 (13%) — +2.50
25 1998 1621 133.9 +0.75 -1.34 0.965 49.3% +12 -164 +85 44.9% -0.22 8–7 (53%) 12–13 (48%) — -0.31 1993 1486 101.6 -2.05 -3.43 0.689 42.8% — +104 — 15.4% -2.46 0–2 1–0 — +0.01
26 1999 1672 136.8 +0.80 -0.84 0.982 49.5% -9 -161 +2 47.7% +0.08 6–4 (60%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 1779 133.7 -0.50 -1.27 0.918 48.9% -59 -310 +78 50.5% -0.12 11–4 (73%) 11–5 (69%) — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 1604 127.5 -3.03 -1.45 0.797 45.9% +13 -202 +186 30.7% -0.91 3–3 (50%) 3–9 (25%) — -1.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 1592 102.9 -1.30 +0.60 0.952 48.7% — — — 44.4% -0.33 1–0 1–1 — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 1520 96.3 -4.05 -0.39 0.683 42.6% +61 — — 10.0% -2.70 — 0–2 — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 1515 99.3 -2.03 +1.03 0.625 42.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1793 139.5 -0.56 -0.38 0.939 48.9% +8 -123 +64 44.9% -0.27 59–57 (51%) 75–85 (47%) 104.2 -1.67 — 1777 133.6 -1.83 -0.70 0.915 48.2% -49 +84 -109 45.6% -0.19 22–27 (45%) 14–27 (34%) 93.3 +3.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.