H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
David Prinosil vs Mark Koevermans H2H: 0-1
Mark Koevermans holds a 1–0 lead over David Prinosil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mark Koevermans leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mark Koevermans won the 1992 Casablanca fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 58
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 1992* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Mark Koevermans | 6-3 6-3 | David Prinosil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Prinosil | #1,091 | #28 | 1,040 | 1,800 | 165 | 208 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Mark Koevermans | #753 | #37 | 712 | 1,777 | 64 | 80 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Prinosil | Mark Koevermans | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1992 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #77 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #130 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #63 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #50 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #48 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #71 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1997 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #89 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #139 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #412 | 1,461 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2000 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2001 | 7–22 | 24.1% | #132 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #229 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2003 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,521 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1063 | 1,515 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |