H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

David Prinosil vs Martin Damm Sr H2H: 5-0

David Prinosil holds a 5–0 lead over Martin Damm Sr in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, David Prinosil leads 2–0 on carpet and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Prinosil won the 2000 Washington Open round of 64 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Prinosil
GER Age 53 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main-draw meetings
Martin Damm Sr
CZE

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
David Prinosil #64 6-3 6-3 Martin Damm Sr Match data Aug 16, 2000* R64 Washington Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
David Prinosil #84 7-6(2) 3-6 7-6(0) 6-4 Martin Damm Sr Match data Jul 2, 2000* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
David Prinosil #75 6-1 6-3 Martin Damm Sr Match data Apr 14, 1999* R64 Japan Open ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
David Prinosil #93 3-6 6-2 7-6(6) Martin Damm Sr Match data Feb 12, 1998* R32 St. Petersburg ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
David Prinosil #38 6-4 6-7(5) 6-4 Martin Damm Sr Match data Nov 8, 1996* R16 Moscow World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Prinosil #1,091 #28 1,040 1,793 165 210 44.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Martin Damm Sr — — — 1,731 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

David Prinosil Martin Damm Sr
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1992 9–9 50.0% #125 1,583 0 0 — — — — — — —
1993 16–25 39.0% #77 1,634 0 0 — — — — — — —
1994 8–13 38.1% #130 1,632 0 0 — — — — — — —
1995 19–18 51.4% #50 1,708 0 1 — — — — — — —
1996 24–24 50.0% #39 1,771 0 2 — — — — — — —
1997 16–26 38.1% #89 1,630 0 2 — — — — — — —
1998 20–25 44.4% #78 1,621 0 2 — — — — — — —
1999 22–23 48.9% #66 1,671 0 2 — — — — — — —
2000 22–18 55.0% #38 1,779 0 3 — — — — — — —
2001 7–22 24.1% #132 1,604 0 3 — — — — — — —
2002 2–2 50.0% #229 1,591 0 3 — — — — — — —
2003 0–4 0.0% #276 1,520 0 3 — — — — — — —
2004 0–1 0.0% #1063 1,514 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

David Prinosil Martin Damm Sr
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1992 — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1993 9 12 21 42.9% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1991 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
1995 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1992 6 8 14 42.9% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1996 13 11 24 54.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 1993 7 11 18 38.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 6 14 57.1%
1997 5 10 15 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 1994 7 12 19 36.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 7 11 36.4%
1998 9 11 20 45.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 7 13 46.2% 1995 7 13 20 35.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
1999 7 10 17 41.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1996 15 13 28 53.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 13 10 23 56.5%
2000 6 11 17 35.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 7 2 9 77.8% 1997 10 13 23 43.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8%
2001 4 14 18 22.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 10 14 24 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
2002 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1999 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 6 11 17 35.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
2004 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 63 94 157 40.1% 13 40 53 24.5% 35 26 61 57.4% 54 50 104 51.9% Career 74 107 181 40.9% 6 28 34 17.6% 22 24 46 47.8% 51 49 100 51.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

David Prinosil Martin Damm Sr
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1992 1584 124.3 -0.94 -0.69 0.944 49.1% -10 +20 — 48.9% -0.08 3–3 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 101.7 +1.25 1989 1492 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.08
1993 1634 137.4 -2.68 +0.92 0.927 48.1% +22 -94 — 43.4% -0.56 5–9 (36%) 9–7 (56%) 101.8 -2.64 1990 1478 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.15
1994 1632 123.0 -2.23 -1.70 0.869 47.6% -33 -99 +66 42.4% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 102.6 +0.54 1991 1504 104.7 — — — — +57 — — 57.1% +0.57 1–0 0–1 — +0.21
1995 1709 138.9 +1.36 +0.40 1.046 51.0% -36 -165 +54 53.1% +0.14 5–9 (36%) 8–9 (47%) 99.6 -0.15 1992 1546 125.4 — — — — +65 -88 — 35.1% -0.91 4–1 (80%) 2–5 (29%) 103.3 +0.26
1996 1772 147.8 +0.83 +0.78 1.014 50.5% +51 -272 -46 49.6% +0.12 7–8 (47%) 10–14 (42%) 97.4 -1.73 1993 1647 128.4 — — — — +28 -196 — 44.8% -0.40 6–6 (50%) 8–5 (62%) 105.4 +0.61
1997 1631 131.8 -1.59 -0.14 0.905 48.5% +42 -157 — 38.4% -0.59 8–6 (57%) 6–10 (38%) 98.9 -1.03 1994 1630 133.5 — — — — -23 -172 +21 44.4% -0.32 3–13 (19%) 9–10 (47%) 92.4 -0.61
1998 1621 133.9 +0.75 -1.34 0.965 49.3% +12 -164 +85 44.9% -0.22 8–7 (53%) 12–13 (48%) 102.2 -0.31 1995 1619 133.0 — — — — +8 — — 42.3% -0.55 9–8 (53%) 11–11 (50%) 102.9 -0.27
1999 1672 136.8 +0.80 -0.84 0.982 49.5% -9 -161 +2 47.7% +0.08 6–4 (60%) 6–8 (43%) 102.8 +0.22 1996 1709 139.5 — — — — +35 — -23 47.9% -0.08 13–8 (62%) 13–18 (42%) 102.9 +1.26
2000 1779 133.7 -0.50 -1.27 0.918 48.9% -59 -310 +78 50.5% -0.12 11–4 (73%) 11–5 (69%) 112.7 +0.01 1997 1694 135.4 — — — — +35 -281 +7 48.3% -0.18 8–7 (53%) 16–10 (62%) 105.2 +0.62
2001 1604 127.5 -3.03 -1.45 0.797 45.9% +13 -202 +186 30.7% -0.91 3–3 (50%) 3–9 (25%) 95.0 -1.97 1998 1649 132.2 — — — — +16 — +23 42.9% -0.50 7–7 (50%) 8–11 (42%) 98.6 -0.31
2002 1592 102.9 -1.30 +0.60 0.952 48.7% — — — 44.4% -0.33 1–0 1–1 — -0.15 1999 1578 123.5 — — — — +27 -177 +52 39.1% -0.78 1–7 (13%) 3–5 (38%) 90.9 -0.57
2003 1520 96.3 -4.05 -0.39 0.683 42.6% +61 — — 10.0% -2.70 — 0–2 — -0.16 2000 1615 127.5 — — — — -72 -159 +102 44.2% -0.34 7–3 (70%) 6–9 (40%) 105.2 +0.30
2004 1515 99.3 -2.03 +1.03 0.625 42.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.15 2001 1514 96.3 — — — — — — +91 15.0% -1.90 — 0–2 — +0.77
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1525 111.4 — — — — +15 — — 37.5% -0.75 — 1–1 — -0.13
Career 1793 139.5 -0.56 -0.38 0.939 48.9% +8 -123 +64 44.9% -0.27 59–57 (51%) 75–85 (47%) 104.2 -1.67 Career 1732 136.6 — — — — +17 -170 +36 43.3% -0.43 59–60 (50%) 77–88 (47%) 101.6 +0.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.