H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
David Prinosil vs Martin Damm Sr H2H: 5-0
David Prinosil holds a 5–0 lead over Martin Damm Sr in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, David Prinosil leads 2–0 on carpet and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Prinosil won the 2000 Washington second round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2000* | Washington | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | David Prinosil | 6-3 6-3 | Martin Damm Sr | Match data |
| Jul 2, 2000* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | David Prinosil | 7-6(2) 3-6 7-6(0) 6-4 | Martin Damm Sr | Match data |
| Apr 14, 1999* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | David Prinosil | 6-1 6-3 | Martin Damm Sr | Match data |
| Feb 12, 1998* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | David Prinosil | 3-6 6-2 7-6(6) | Martin Damm Sr | Match data |
| Nov 8, 1996* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | David Prinosil | 6-4 6-7(5) 6-4 | Martin Damm Sr | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Prinosil | #1,091 | #28 | 1,040 | 1,800 | 165 | 208 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Martin Damm Sr | — | — | — | 1,744 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| David Prinosil | Martin Damm Sr | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1992 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #77 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #130 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #50 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #89 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 7–22 | 24.1% | #132 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #229 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,521 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1063 | 1,515 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |