H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
David Prinosil vs Patrick Baur H2H: 2-0
David Prinosil holds a 2–0 lead over Patrick Baur in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, David Prinosil leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Prinosil won the 1996 Ostrava fourth round 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 1996* | Ostrava | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | David Prinosil | 6-0 6-3 | Patrick Baur | Match data |
| Apr 12, 1995* | Tokyo Outdoor | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | David Prinosil | 6-1 6-2 | Patrick Baur | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Prinosil | #1,091 | #28 | 1,040 | 1,800 | 165 | 208 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Patrick Baur | #571 | #74 | 476 | 1,697 | 67 | 107 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Prinosil | Patrick Baur | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1992 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #77 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #130 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #50 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #215 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #178 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #89 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #192 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #136 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #82 | 1,494 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2000 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #130 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2001 | 7–22 | 24.1% | #132 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #257 | 1,555 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #229 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #180 | 1,589 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2003 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,521 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1063 | 1,515 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #264 | 1,495 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #380 | 1,517 | 0 | 2 |