H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
David Prinosil vs Petr Luxa H2H: 1-0
David Prinosil holds a 1–0 lead over Petr Luxa in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Prinosil leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Prinosil won the 1998 Basel third round 7-6(7) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 54
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2003 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Q1 | Hard | David Prinosil | 4-6 6-0 6-3 | Petr Luxa | Match data |
| Oct 8, 1998* | Basel | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | David Prinosil | 7-6(7) 6-4 | Petr Luxa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Prinosil | #1,091 | #28 | 1,040 | 1,800 | 165 | 208 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Petr Luxa | #1,497 | #150 | 294 | 1,500 | 1 | 20 | 4.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Prinosil | Petr Luxa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1992 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #77 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #130 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #50 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #334 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #89 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #181 | 1,411 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2001 | 7–22 | 24.1% | #132 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #229 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #478 | 1,424 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2003 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,521 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,413 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1063 | 1,515 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #456 | 1,446 | 0 | 0 |