David Prinosil
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marc Rosset | 1 | 7 | 8 | Oct 2, 2003 | H2H |
| Marat Safin | 1 | 7 | 8 | Oct 25, 2001 | H2H |
| Goran Ivanisevic | 1 | 7 | 8 | Mar 21, 2000 | H2H |
| Petr Korda | 2 | 6 | 8 | Feb 26, 1998 | H2H |
| Greg Rusedski | 2 | 5 | 7 | Aug 8, 2001 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC
David Prinosil vs Rene Hanak H2H: 1-0
David Prinosil holds a 1–0 lead over Rene Hanak in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Prinosil leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, David Prinosil won the 1997 Ostrava round of 32 7-6(4) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Prinosil | 7-6(4) 7-5 | Rene Hanak | Match data | Oct 16, 1997* | R32 | Ostrava | World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Carpet |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Prinosil | #1,091 | #28 | 1,040 | 1,793 | 165 | 210 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Rene Hanak | #1,346 | #349 | 94 | 1,500 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Prinosil | Rene Hanak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #706 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #77 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #130 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #50 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1996 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #39 | 1,771 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1997 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #89 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #372 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2000 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #38 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2001 | 7–22 | 24.1% | #132 | 1,604 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #229 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2003 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,520 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1063 | 1,514 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | David Prinosil | Rene Hanak | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1992 | — | — | — | — | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1994 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1995 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1996 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 11 | 7 | 18 | 61.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1997 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 11 | 11 | 22 | 50.0% | 1997 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 1998 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1999 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2000 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2001 | 4 | 14 | 18 | 22.2% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2002 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2003 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2004 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 63 | 94 | 157 | 40.1% | 13 | 40 | 53 | 24.5% | 35 | 26 | 61 | 57.4% | 54 | 50 | 104 | 51.9% | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | David Prinosil | Rene Hanak | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1484 | 95.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.19 |
| 19 | 1992 | 1584 | 124.3 | -0.94 | -0.69 | 0.944 | 49.1% | -10 | +20 | — | 48.9% | -0.08 | 3–3 (50%) | 3–4 (43%) | — | +1.25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 1634 | 137.4 | -2.68 | +0.92 | 0.927 | 48.1% | +22 | -94 | — | 43.4% | -0.56 | 5–9 (36%) | 9–7 (56%) | — | -2.64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1994 | 1632 | 123.0 | -2.23 | -1.70 | 0.869 | 47.6% | -33 | -99 | +66 | 42.4% | -0.56 | 2–4 (33%) | 6–3 (67%) | — | +0.54 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1995 | 1709 | 138.9 | +1.36 | +0.40 | 1.046 | 51.0% | -36 | -165 | +54 | 53.1% | +0.14 | 5–9 (36%) | 8–9 (47%) | — | -0.15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1996 | 1772 | 147.8 | +0.83 | +0.78 | 1.014 | 50.5% | +51 | -272 | -46 | 49.6% | +0.12 | 7–8 (47%) | 10–14 (42%) | — | -1.73 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1997 | 1631 | 131.8 | -1.59 | -0.14 | 0.905 | 48.5% | +42 | -157 | — | 38.4% | -0.59 | 8–6 (57%) | 6–10 (38%) | — | -1.03 | 1997 | 1473 | 102.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -1.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.08 |
| 25 | 1998 | 1621 | 133.9 | +0.75 | -1.34 | 0.965 | 49.3% | +12 | -164 | +85 | 44.9% | -0.22 | 8–7 (53%) | 12–13 (48%) | — | -0.31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1999 | 1672 | 136.8 | +0.80 | -0.84 | 0.982 | 49.5% | -9 | -161 | +2 | 47.7% | +0.08 | 6–4 (60%) | 6–8 (43%) | — | +0.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2000 | 1779 | 133.7 | -0.50 | -1.27 | 0.918 | 48.9% | -59 | -310 | +78 | 50.5% | -0.12 | 11–4 (73%) | 11–5 (69%) | — | +0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2001 | 1604 | 127.5 | -3.03 | -1.45 | 0.797 | 45.9% | +13 | -202 | +186 | 30.7% | -0.91 | 3–3 (50%) | 3–9 (25%) | — | -1.97 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2002 | 1592 | 102.9 | -1.30 | +0.60 | 0.952 | 48.7% | — | — | — | 44.4% | -0.33 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | -0.15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2003 | 1520 | 96.3 | -4.05 | -0.39 | 0.683 | 42.6% | +61 | — | — | 10.0% | -2.70 | — | 0–2 | — | -0.16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2004 | 1515 | 99.3 | -2.03 | +1.03 | 0.625 | 42.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1793 | 139.5 | -0.56 | -0.38 | 0.939 | 48.9% | +8 | -123 | +64 | 44.9% | -0.27 | 59–57 (51%) | 75–85 (47%) | 104.2 | -1.67 | — | 1500 | 98.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.75 | — | 0–1 | — | +13.50 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Rene Hanak
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Prinosil | 0 | 1 | 1 | Oct 16, 1997 | H2H |
| Stefano Pescosolido | 0 | 1 | 1 | Aug 9, 1990 | H2H |