H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

David Prinosil vs Sebastien Lareau H2H: 1-0

David Prinosil holds a 1–0 lead over Sebastien Lareau in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Prinosil leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Prinosil won the 1995 Hong Kong Open round of 32 7-5 1-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Prinosil
GER Age 53 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Sebastien Lareau
CAN Age 53 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
David Prinosil #91 7-5 1-6 6-4 Sebastien Lareau #76 Match data Apr 20, 1995* R32 Hong Kong Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Prinosil #1,091 #28 1,040 1,793 165 210 44.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Sebastien Lareau #1,018 #76 622 1,720 83 122 40.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Prinosil Sebastien Lareau
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1989 0–1 0.0% #1015 1,493 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1991 1–1 50.0% #349 1,505 0 0
19 1992 9–9 50.0% #125 1,583 0 0 1992 1–2 33.3% #197 1,501 0 0
20 1993 16–25 39.0% #77 1,634 0 0 1993 2–3 40.0% #131 1,531 0 0
21 1994 8–13 38.1% #130 1,632 0 0 1994 3–13 18.8% #119 1,482 0 0
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #50 1,708 0 1 1995 12–17 41.4% #136 1,557 0 0
23 1996 24–24 50.0% #39 1,771 0 2 1996 15–15 50.0% #105 1,676 0 0
24 1997 16–26 38.1% #89 1,630 0 2 1997 8–15 34.8% #187 1,591 0 0
25 1998 20–25 44.4% #78 1,621 0 2 1998 19–19 50.0% #79 1,657 0 0
26 1999 22–23 48.9% #66 1,671 0 2 1999 12–18 40.0% #102 1,616 0 0
27 2000 22–18 55.0% #38 1,779 0 3 2000 5–11 31.2% #124 1,597 0 0
28 2001 7–22 24.1% #132 1,604 0 3 2001 5–7 41.7% #229 1,522 0 0
29 2002 2–2 50.0% #229 1,591 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 2003 0–4 0.0% #276 1,520 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 2004 0–1 0.0% #1063 1,514 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Prinosil Sebastien Lareau
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1992 — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1992 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 9 12 21 42.9% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1993 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1994 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1995 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1995 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
23 1996 13 11 24 54.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 1996 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 1997 5 10 15 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 1997 6 11 17 35.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 1998 9 11 20 45.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 7 13 46.2% 1998 14 11 25 56.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 1999 7 10 17 41.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1999 9 14 23 39.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
27 2000 6 11 17 35.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 7 2 9 77.8% 2000 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 2001 4 14 18 22.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 2002 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 63 94 157 40.1% 13 40 53 24.5% 35 26 61 57.4% 54 50 104 51.9% — 57 80 137 41.6% 1 9 10 10.0% 12 19 31 38.7% 13 14 27 48.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 337/375 of David Prinosil's and 180/204 of Sebastien Lareau's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age David Prinosil Sebastien Lareau
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 2/2 13.0 6.5 44.7% 74.2% 46.6% 49.3% 21.8% 58.6% 38.4%
19 1992 16/18 4.7 5.1 51.2% 68.4% 46.2% 58.7% 43.7% 57.9% 39.8% 1992 3/3 3.0 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 47.5% 71.6% 33.3% 60.1% 43.6%
20 1993 38/41 5.7 5.8 48.0% 70.6% 46.8% 53.3% 40.1% 58.2% 38.8% 1993 2/5 6.5 12.0 49.5% 67.9% 34.2% 35.0% 40.3% 51.0% 33.7%
21 1994 18/21 8.6 7.1 44.8% 77.2% 45.0% 65.0% 33.6% 59.6% 35.1% 1994 14/16 7.1 6.0 54.3% 71.6% 41.9% 59.4% 34.6% 58.4% 35.9%
22 1995 37/37 8.6 5.5 50.5% 78.2% 48.5% 63.9% 44.6% 63.5% 38.1% 1995 28/29 8.4 5.7 56.5% 76.7% 43.5% 58.3% 37.7% 62.2% 36.7%
23 1996 43/48 7.3 4.0 53.1% 75.6% 49.1% 64.9% 39.1% 62.9% 37.6% 1996 26/30 6.1 4.0 59.9% 71.5% 50.8% 64.3% 47.9% 63.2% 39.9%
24 1997 38/42 6.6 3.8 50.7% 72.9% 47.9% 58.1% 42.5% 60.3% 36.0% 1997 23/23 3.8 6.1 61.6% 68.4% 40.6% 53.6% 40.6% 57.7% 38.5%
25 1998 39/45 8.6 5.4 50.7% 78.2% 47.8% 51.6% 43.1% 63.0% 35.7% 1998 32/38 7.6 3.8 66.4% 70.8% 45.2% 63.1% 40.7% 62.4% 37.7%
26 1999 40/45 7.2 4.4 50.7% 76.0% 50.4% 53.9% 37.6% 63.3% 36.1% 1999 25/30 6.4 3.0 61.4% 69.6% 51.7% 65.1% 48.9% 62.4% 35.8%
27 2000 33/40 9.1 5.4 52.5% 75.0% 46.4% 65.6% 39.4% 61.4% 35.4% 2000 13/16 6.2 3.8 62.2% 67.8% 49.9% 56.8% 39.7% 60.7% 35.5%
28 2001 26/29 5.4 4.2 52.8% 69.9% 45.7% 55.7% 37.5% 58.2% 33.3% 2001 12/12 4.4 3.0 61.3% 68.4% 46.5% 53.3% 34.0% 60.1% 33.5%
29 2002 4/4 6.3 7.3 50.9% 73.7% 45.0% 63.6% 37.2% 58.9% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 4/4 3.8 6.0 58.0% 63.5% 39.4% 37.7% 13.3% 52.7% 32.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 1/1 1.0 7.0 54.0% 67.6% 41.4% 62.5% — 55.6% 27.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 337/375 7.2 5.0 50.8% 74.4% 47.6% 58.6% 39.9% 61.1% 36.6% — 180/205 6.5 4.5 60.5% 71.0% 46.1% 59.9% 41.1% 61.1% 37.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Prinosil Sebastien Lareau
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1494 99.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.08
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1505 103.4 +1.23 -0.86 0.927 48.0% — — — 50.0% -1.00 1–1 1–0 — +0.22
19 1992 1584 124.3 -0.94 -0.69 0.944 49.1% -10 +20 — 48.9% -0.08 3–3 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 101.7 +1.25 1992 1502 106.2 -0.04 +0.85 1.094 50.9% +40 — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 1–1 — +0.31
20 1993 1634 137.4 -2.68 +0.92 0.927 48.1% +22 -94 — 43.4% -0.56 5–9 (36%) 9–7 (56%) 101.8 -2.64 1993 1531 110.6 -0.23 +0.55 0.687 43.1% — — +53 35.7% -1.21 1–0 2–0 — -0.06
21 1994 1632 123.0 -2.23 -1.70 0.869 47.6% -33 -99 +66 42.4% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 102.6 +0.54 1994 1482 116.2 -2.66 -0.77 0.864 47.4% +32 — — 26.8% -1.29 2–4 (33%) 3–6 (33%) 99.4 +0.37
22 1995 1709 138.9 +1.36 +0.40 1.046 51.0% -36 -165 +54 53.1% +0.14 5–9 (36%) 8–9 (47%) 99.6 -0.15 1995 1558 135.8 +0.09 -0.30 0.971 49.2% +40 — -29 40.8% -0.44 2–4 (33%) 5–6 (45%) 97.8 -0.07
23 1996 1772 147.8 +0.83 +0.78 1.014 50.5% +51 -272 -46 49.6% +0.12 7–8 (47%) 10–14 (42%) 97.4 -1.73 1996 1677 142.6 +0.84 +2.33 1.084 51.2% -11 — -78 51.5% +0.25 3–4 (43%) 2–4 (33%) 99.5 -1.30
24 1997 1631 131.8 -1.59 -0.14 0.905 48.5% +42 -157 — 38.4% -0.59 8–6 (57%) 6–10 (38%) 98.9 -1.03 1997 1591 120.1 -2.53 +0.23 0.910 48.2% +7 -69 +10 35.7% -0.84 2–2 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 99.1 -0.18
25 1998 1621 133.9 +0.75 -1.34 0.965 49.3% +12 -164 +85 44.9% -0.22 8–7 (53%) 12–13 (48%) 102.2 -0.31 1998 1658 133.0 +0.45 +0.31 1.002 49.8% +23 — -40 51.5% -0.07 5–6 (45%) 11–9 (55%) 103.4 +0.89
26 1999 1672 136.8 +0.80 -0.84 0.982 49.5% -9 -161 +2 47.7% +0.08 6–4 (60%) 6–8 (43%) 102.8 +0.22 1999 1617 128.1 +0.03 -1.37 0.950 49.1% +16 — +14 41.3% -0.45 6–7 (46%) 7–7 (50%) 100.5 +1.09
27 2000 1779 133.7 -0.50 -1.27 0.918 48.9% -59 -310 +78 50.5% -0.12 11–4 (73%) 11–5 (69%) 112.7 +0.01 2000 1598 117.1 -1.05 -1.01 0.904 48.4% +32 — +5 40.9% -0.57 0–5 (0%) 4–5 (44%) 94.2 +0.40
28 2001 1604 127.5 -3.03 -1.45 0.797 45.9% +13 -202 +186 30.7% -0.91 3–3 (50%) 3–9 (25%) 95.0 -1.97 2001 1522 107.8 -0.57 -2.57 0.841 47.2% +60 — — 39.3% -0.89 3–1 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 102.9 +0.82
29 2002 1592 102.9 -1.30 +0.60 0.952 48.7% — — — 44.4% -0.33 1–0 1–1 — -0.15 2002 1503 93.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 1520 96.3 -4.05 -0.39 0.683 42.6% +61 — — 10.0% -2.70 — 0–2 — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 1515 99.3 -2.03 +1.03 0.625 42.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1793 139.5 -0.56 -0.38 0.939 48.9% +8 -123 +64 44.9% -0.27 59–57 (51%) 75–85 (47%) 104.2 -1.67 — 1721 133.2 -0.41 -0.11 0.955 49.1% +21 -69 -10 42.5% -0.47 25–35 (42%) 43–47 (48%) 100.9 +1.19

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.