H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
David Prinosil vs Wayne Black H2H: 0-2
Wayne Black holds a 2–0 lead over David Prinosil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Wayne Black leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Wayne Black won the 1999 Miami Masters first round 1-6 7-6(7) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ZIM
Age 52
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 1999* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Wayne Black | 1-6 7-6(7) 6-4 | David Prinosil | Match data |
| Oct 23, 1998* | Ostrava | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Wayne Black | 3-6 6-2 6-4 | David Prinosil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Prinosil | #1,091 | #28 | 1,040 | 1,800 | 165 | 208 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Wayne Black | #1,469 | #69 | 646 | 1,721 | 52 | 81 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Prinosil | Wayne Black | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1992 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #719 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #77 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #360 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #130 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #194 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #50 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #252 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #89 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #94 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #151 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #107 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #160 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2001 | 7–22 | 24.1% | #132 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #417 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #229 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #302 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2003 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,521 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1063 | 1,515 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |