H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

David Prinosil vs Yahiya Doumbia H2H: 0-1

Yahiya Doumbia holds a 1–0 lead over David Prinosil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yahiya Doumbia leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yahiya Doumbia won the 1995 Bordeaux round of 16 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Prinosil
GER Age 53 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Yahiya Doumbia
SEN Age 63 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Yahiya Doumbia #282 6-3 6-2 David Prinosil #70 Match data Sep 15, 1995* R16 Bordeaux ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Prinosil #1,091 #28 1,040 1,793 165 210 44.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Yahiya Doumbia #1,312 #74 343 1,627 22 31 41.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Prinosil Yahiya Doumbia
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1992 9–9 50.0% #125 1,583 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1993 16–25 39.0% #77 1,634 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1994 8–13 38.1% #130 1,632 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #50 1,708 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 1996 24–24 50.0% #39 1,771 0 2 — — — — — — —
24 1997 16–26 38.1% #89 1,630 0 2 1988 16–15 51.6% #83 1,611 0 1
25 1998 20–25 44.4% #78 1,621 0 2 1989 0–11 0.0% #389 1,486 0 1
26 1999 22–23 48.9% #66 1,671 0 2 1990 0–1 0.0% #540 1,483 0 1
27 2000 22–18 55.0% #38 1,779 0 3 1991 0–2 0.0% #230 1,455 0 1
28 2001 7–22 24.1% #132 1,604 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 2002 2–2 50.0% #229 1,591 0 3 1993 1–1 50.0% #397 1,472 0 1
30 2003 0–4 0.0% #276 1,520 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 2004 0–1 0.0% #1063 1,514 0 3 1995 5–0 100.0% #142 1,580 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 1996 0–1 0.0% #429 1,559 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Prinosil Yahiya Doumbia
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1992 — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 9 12 21 42.9% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1995 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1996 13 11 24 54.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 11 7 18 61.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1997 5 10 15 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 1988 10 7 17 58.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4%
25 1998 9 11 20 45.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 7 13 46.2% 1989 0 8 8 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1999 7 10 17 41.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1990 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2000 6 11 17 35.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 7 2 9 77.8% 1991 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2001 4 14 18 22.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1995 5 0 5 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 63 94 157 40.1% 13 40 53 24.5% 35 26 61 57.4% 54 50 104 51.9% — 15 15 30 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 8 14 42.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 337/375 of David Prinosil's and 10/10 of Yahiya Doumbia's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age David Prinosil Yahiya Doumbia
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1992 16/18 4.7 5.1 51.2% 68.4% 46.2% 58.7% 43.7% 57.9% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 38/41 5.7 5.8 48.0% 70.6% 46.8% 53.3% 40.1% 58.2% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1994 18/21 8.6 7.1 44.8% 77.2% 45.0% 65.0% 33.6% 59.6% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1995 37/37 8.6 5.5 50.5% 78.2% 48.5% 63.9% 44.6% 63.5% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1996 43/48 7.3 4.0 53.1% 75.6% 49.1% 64.9% 39.1% 62.9% 37.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1997 38/42 6.6 3.8 50.7% 72.9% 47.9% 58.1% 42.5% 60.3% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1998 39/45 8.6 5.4 50.7% 78.2% 47.8% 51.6% 43.1% 63.0% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1999 40/45 7.2 4.4 50.7% 76.0% 50.4% 53.9% 37.6% 63.3% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 33/40 9.1 5.4 52.5% 75.0% 46.4% 65.6% 39.4% 61.4% 35.4% 1991 2/2 7.0 2.5 54.4% 68.7% 56.0% 43.3% 36.1% 63.2% 33.9%
28 2001 26/29 5.4 4.2 52.8% 69.9% 45.7% 55.7% 37.5% 58.2% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 4/4 6.3 7.3 50.9% 73.7% 45.0% 63.6% 37.2% 58.9% 39.1% 1993 2/2 5.0 7.0 50.3% 76.5% 53.9% 73.8% 33.3% 65.4% 35.6%
30 2003 4/4 3.8 6.0 58.0% 63.5% 39.4% 37.7% 13.3% 52.7% 32.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 1/1 1.0 7.0 54.0% 67.6% 41.4% 62.5% — 55.6% 27.8% 1995 5/5 3.8 1.0 60.5% 72.2% 53.7% 75.0% 58.9% 64.7% 46.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 1/1 1.0 8.0 45.0% 63.0% 33.3% 50.0% 23.1% 46.7% 40.0%
Career — 337/375 7.2 5.0 50.8% 74.4% 47.6% 58.6% 39.9% 61.1% 36.6% — 10/53 4.4 3.2 55.7% 71.4% 52.2% 65.9% 45.6% 62.7% 41.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Prinosil Yahiya Doumbia
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1992 1584 124.3 -0.94 -0.69 0.944 49.1% -10 +20 — 48.9% -0.08 3–3 (50%) 3–4 (43%) — +1.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 1634 137.4 -2.68 +0.92 0.927 48.1% +22 -94 — 43.4% -0.56 5–9 (36%) 9–7 (56%) — -2.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1994 1632 123.0 -2.23 -1.70 0.869 47.6% -33 -99 +66 42.4% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) — +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1995 1709 138.9 +1.36 +0.40 1.046 51.0% -36 -165 +54 53.1% +0.14 5–9 (36%) 8–9 (47%) — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1996 1772 147.8 +0.83 +0.78 1.014 50.5% +51 -272 -46 49.6% +0.12 7–8 (47%) 10–14 (42%) — -1.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1997 1631 131.8 -1.59 -0.14 0.905 48.5% +42 -157 — 38.4% -0.59 8–6 (57%) 6–10 (38%) — -1.03 1988 1611 132.2 — — — — +75 -127 — 50.0% +0.08 6–5 (55%) 6–7 (46%) — +1.42
25 1998 1621 133.9 +0.75 -1.34 0.965 49.3% +12 -164 +85 44.9% -0.22 8–7 (53%) 12–13 (48%) — -0.31 1989 1487 104.0 — — — — +41 — — 11.1% -2.44 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.53
26 1999 1672 136.8 +0.80 -0.84 0.982 49.5% -9 -161 +2 47.7% +0.08 6–4 (60%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.22 1990 1484 108.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.18
27 2000 1779 133.7 -0.50 -1.27 0.918 48.9% -59 -310 +78 50.5% -0.12 11–4 (73%) 11–5 (69%) — +0.01 1991 1456 98.2 -1.37 -1.98 0.922 48.2% — — — 33.3% -1.17 0–2 1–1 — +0.15
28 2001 1604 127.5 -3.03 -1.45 0.797 45.9% +13 -202 +186 30.7% -0.91 3–3 (50%) 3–9 (25%) — -1.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 1592 102.9 -1.30 +0.60 0.952 48.7% — — — 44.4% -0.33 1–0 1–1 — -0.15 1993 1473 108.7 -0.76 +0.86 1.027 51.3% — — — 60.0% +0.60 0–1 1–0 — 0.00
30 2003 1520 96.3 -4.05 -0.39 0.683 42.6% +61 — — 10.0% -2.70 — 0–2 — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 1515 99.3 -2.03 +1.03 0.625 42.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.15 1995 1580 121.7 -0.73 +3.00 1.323 56.0% +30 — — 100.0% +3.10 — — — +0.61
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1559 97.8 -0.20 -0.05 0.750 42.9% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.20
Career — 1793 139.5 -0.56 -0.38 0.939 48.9% +8 -123 +64 44.9% -0.27 59–57 (51%) 75–85 (47%) 104.2 -1.67 — 1628 125.9 -0.81 +1.27 1.107 52.2% +61 -127 — 43.8% -0.31 6–9 (40%) 8–12 (40%) 97.2 +3.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.