David Rikl
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Chesnokov | 2 | 2 | 4 | May 25, 1994 | H2H |
| Jiri Novak | 2 | 1 | 3 | Aug 8, 1996 | H2H |
| Thomas Muster | 0 | 3 | 3 | Apr 11, 1996 | H2H |
| Cedric Pioline | 2 | 1 | 3 | Apr 29, 1994 | H2H |
| Richard Krajicek | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 29, 1997 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC
David Rikl holds a 1–0 lead over Fernando Luna in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Rikl leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, David Rikl won the 1989 Prague round of 32 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Rikl | 7-6 6-2 | Fernando Luna | Match data | Aug 10, 1989* | R32 | Prague | ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Rikl | #852 | #41 | 809 | 1,687 | 53 | 92 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Fernando Luna | #723 | #33 | 310 | 1,779 | 167 | 160 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Rikl | Fernando Luna | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #400 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #322 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #340 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #151 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #87 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #95 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #66 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #80 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #81 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #83 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #60 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #150 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #53 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #173 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #70 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #111 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #868 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #52 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #261 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #59 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #135 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #356 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | David Rikl | Fernando Luna | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 1989 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1978 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1992 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1979 | — | — | — | — | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1993 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1980 | — | — | — | — | 18 | 13 | 31 | 58.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1994 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 33.3% | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1981 | — | — | — | — | 17 | 15 | 32 | 53.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1995 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1982 | — | — | — | — | 23 | 18 | 41 | 56.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1996 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 7 | 15 | 22 | 31.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1983 | — | — | — | — | 19 | 13 | 32 | 59.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1997 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 1984 | — | — | — | — | 12 | 14 | 26 | 46.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | — | — | — | — | 10 | 14 | 24 | 41.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1999 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1986 | — | — | — | — | 19 | 14 | 33 | 57.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | — | — | — | — | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | — | — | — | — | 18 | 11 | 29 | 62.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | — | — | — | — | 11 | 15 | 26 | 42.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | — | — | — | — | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 13 | 32 | 45 | 28.9% | 32 | 46 | 78 | 41.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 167 | 157 | 324 | 51.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | David Rikl | Fernando Luna | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 1989 | 1504 | 102.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | 0.00 | — | 1–1 | — | +0.28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 1492 | 101.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 25.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | -0.02 | 1977 | 1512 | 110.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.75 | — | — | — | +0.06 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1474 | 99.3 | -0.87 | -1.37 | 0.804 | 47.8% | +55 | — | — | 30.0% | -1.50 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.56 | 1978 | 1541 | 122.3 | — | — | — | — | — | +41 | — | 60.0% | +1.10 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.24 |
| 21 | 1992 | 1503 | 110.9 | -3.14 | -0.80 | 0.856 | 47.2% | — | +80 | — | 41.4% | -0.90 | 3–2 (60%) | 0–1 | — | +0.71 | 1979 | 1517 | 119.6 | — | — | — | — | — | +31 | — | 43.3% | -0.23 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–4 (20%) | 95.7 | +1.17 |
| 22 | 1993 | 1532 | 121.2 | -2.57 | -0.92 | 0.837 | 46.7% | -53 | +80 | — | 37.0% | -1.04 | 2–3 (40%) | 4–3 (57%) | 100.3 | +0.11 | 1980 | 1708 | 148.6 | — | — | — | — | — | +22 | — | 54.3% | +0.33 | 5–3 (63%) | 3–1 (75%) | 104.7 | -1.05 |
| 23 | 1994 | 1536 | 126.2 | -2.08 | -2.48 | 0.847 | 47.1% | -44 | +135 | — | 38.9% | -0.83 | 5–8 (38%) | 5–12 (29%) | 95.3 | +0.69 | 1981 | 1695 | 133.6 | — | — | — | — | — | +19 | — | 49.4% | +0.10 | 10–6 (63%) | 2–7 (22%) | 98.7 | +1.18 |
| 24 | 1995 | 1534 | 123.3 | -1.30 | -0.19 | 0.959 | 49.3% | -48 | +102 | — | 42.0% | -0.48 | 1–5 (17%) | 4–3 (57%) | 96.2 | +0.78 | 1982 | 1725 | 145.1 | — | — | — | — | — | +18 | — | 52.7% | +0.30 | 4–4 (50%) | 5–4 (56%) | 100.9 | -0.88 |
| 25 | 1996 | 1529 | 123.0 | -3.53 | -0.97 | 0.843 | 46.6% | -13 | +41 | — | 39.0% | -0.89 | 3–9 (25%) | 4–5 (44%) | 93.6 | +0.07 | 1983 | 1733 | 134.9 | — | — | — | — | — | +26 | — | 57.7% | +0.86 | 7–3 (70%) | 2–2 (50%) | 101.7 | +2.65 |
| 26 | 1997 | 1578 | 115.2 | -1.18 | +1.34 | 0.921 | 48.9% | -56 | — | +29 | 50.0% | 0.00 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.27 | 1984 | 1647 | 140.1 | — | — | — | — | — | +41 | — | 47.5% | +0.34 | 3–4 (43%) | 1–5 (17%) | 94.7 | -0.03 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1620 | 133.2 | — | — | — | — | — | +19 | — | 42.4% | -0.15 | 5–4 (56%) | 3–6 (33%) | 99.2 | -1.21 |
| 28 | 1999 | 1565 | 98.3 | -0.24 | +1.75 | 1.063 | 50.0% | — | — | — | 33.3% | 0.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.03 | 1986 | 1691 | 141.4 | — | — | — | — | — | +38 | — | 57.5% | +0.71 | 4–5 (44%) | 5–6 (45%) | 98.6 | +0.24 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1644 | 114.7 | — | — | — | — | — | +31 | — | 40.0% | -1.10 | — | 1–0 | — | -0.15 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1706 | 136.6 | — | — | — | — | — | +48 | — | 58.7% | +0.56 | 1–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.63 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1566 | 117.8 | — | — | — | — | — | +22 | — | 46.0% | -0.14 | 2–5 (29%) | 6–4 (60%) | 96.1 | +0.28 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1588 | 130.6 | — | — | — | — | — | +37 | — | 43.9% | 0.00 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–5 (17%) | 97.5 | -0.14 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1536 | 93.3 | -2.58 | +0.12 | 0.731 | 42.6% | — | — | — | 12.5% | -2.88 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.23 |
| Career | — | 1687 | 125.9 | -2.34 | -1.19 | 0.867 | 47.4% | -37 | +85 | +29 | 39.5% | -0.81 | 15–30 (33%) | 19–25 (43%) | 91.8 | +2.03 | — | 1779 | 144.3 | -2.58 | +0.12 | 0.731 | 42.6% | — | +29 | — | 50.7% | +0.24 | 44–43 (51%) | 32–47 (41%) | 93.6 | +0.84 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Chesnokov | 2 | 2 | 4 | May 25, 1994 | H2H |
| Jiri Novak | 2 | 1 | 3 | Aug 8, 1996 | H2H |
| Thomas Muster | 0 | 3 | 3 | Apr 11, 1996 | H2H |
| Cedric Pioline | 2 | 1 | 3 | Apr 29, 1994 | H2H |
| Richard Krajicek | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 29, 1997 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andres Gomez | 0 | 6 | 6 | May 30, 1990 | H2H |
| Balazs Taroczy | 0 | 5 | 5 | Sep 18, 1982 | H2H |
| Thierry Tulasne | 0 | 4 | 4 | Aug 23, 1990 | H2H |
| Francesco Cancellotti | 2 | 2 | 4 | Sep 14, 1988 | H2H |
| Aaron Krickstein | 1 | 3 | 4 | May 5, 1988 | H2H |