H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
David Rikl vs Neil Borwick H2H: 0-1
Neil Borwick holds a 1–0 lead over David Rikl in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Neil Borwick leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Neil Borwick won the 1992 Newport third round 7-6(5) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 55
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 58
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 1992* | Newport | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Neil Borwick | 7-6(5) 6-4 | David Rikl | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Rikl | #852 | #41 | 809 | 1,685 | 53 | 92 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Neil Borwick | #1,150 | #104 | 441 | 1,661 | 25 | 50 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Rikl | Neil Borwick | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #400 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #506 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #597 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #151 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #95 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #189 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #80 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #173 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #83 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #176 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #150 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #112 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #173 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 1–14 | 6.7% | #242 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #868 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |