H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
David Sanchez vs M. Goellner H2H: 1-0
David Sanchez holds a 1–0 lead over M. Goellner in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Sanchez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, David Sanchez won the 2001 Palermo third round 6-2 4-6 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 55
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2001* | Palermo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | David Sanchez | 6-2 4-6 7-6(4) | M. Goellner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Sanchez | #1,116 | #41 | 832 | 1,730 | 87 | 119 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| M. Goellner | #1,172 | #26 | 1,072 | 1,841 | 152 | 188 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Sanchez | M. Goellner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #262 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #196 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #32 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2001 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #74 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #79 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #60 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #78 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2003 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #50 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #53 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2004 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #74 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 22–34 | 39.3% | #51 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2005 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #137 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 11–25 | 30.6% | #118 | 1,592 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #324 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #189 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #176 | 1,542 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #311 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |