David Sanchez
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gaston Gaudio | 1 | 6 | 7 | May 11, 2005 | H2H |
| Nicolas Massu | 3 | 3 | 6 | Jul 23, 2005 | H2H |
| Jose Acasuso | 3 | 3 | 6 | Sep 17, 2004 | H2H |
| Carlos Moya | 1 | 4 | 5 | May 12, 2004 | H2H |
| Christophe Rochus | 1 | 3 | 4 | Sep 29, 2005 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Sargis Sargsian holds a 2–1 lead over David Sanchez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Sargis Sargsian leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sargis Sargsian won the 2005 Australian Open round of 128 7-6(5) 4-6 1-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sargis Sargsian | 7-6(5) 4-6 1-6 6-4 6-2 | David Sanchez | Match data | Jan 19, 2005* | R128 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Sargis Sargsian | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | David Sanchez | Match data | Jul 28, 2001* | QF | Sopot | ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Clay |
| David Sanchez | 6-3 6-4 | Sargis Sargsian | Match data | Jul 20, 2000* | R32 | Croatia Open Umag | ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Sanchez | #1,116 | #41 | 832 | 1,719 | 87 | 119 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Sargis Sargsian | #1,525 | #38 | 978 | 1,811 | 156 | 208 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Sanchez | Sargis Sargsian | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #262 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #615 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #196 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #220 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #74 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #60 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #69 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2003 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #50 | 1,623 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2004 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #74 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #59 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2005 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #137 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #94 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #72 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #103 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 17–27 | 38.6% | #75 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #294 | 1,589 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | David Sanchez | Sargis Sargsian | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 19 | 1997 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2001 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 11 | 13 | 24 | 45.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 24 | 2002 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0.0% | 19 | 14 | 33 | 57.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1997 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 25 | 2003 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% | 20 | 15 | 35 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1998 | 6 | 13 | 19 | 31.6% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 26 | 2004 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 15 | 16 | 31 | 48.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1999 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 27 | 2005 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 33.3% | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 13 | 12 | 25 | 52.0% | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 9 | 14 | 23 | 39.1% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 9 | 35 | 44 | 20.5% | 78 | 77 | 155 | 50.3% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | 68 | 103 | 171 | 39.8% | 45 | 58 | 103 | 43.7% | 28 | 30 | 58 | 48.3% | 15 | 17 | 32 | 46.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 195/206 of David Sanchez's and 313/364 of Sargis Sargsian's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | David Sanchez | Sargis Sargsian | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 19 | 1997 | 1/1 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 50.9% | 55.2% | 53.6% | 20.0% | 40.0% | 54.4% | 37.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 2/2 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 71.0% | 54.8% | 38.7% | 57.1% | 62.5% | 50.4% | 33.2% | 1993 | 2/2 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 62.4% | 56.6% | 57.6% | 68.3% | 34.5% | 57.6% | 36.0% |
| 21 | 1999 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 74.0% | 57.4% | 31.6% | 58.3% | 27.3% | 50.7% | 36.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 8/8 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 63.0% | 61.9% | 50.6% | 62.9% | 51.2% | 57.8% | 47.0% | 1995 | 2/4 | 5.0 | 7.0 | 57.5% | 78.7% | 29.9% | 46.7% | 47.4% | 58.4% | 33.4% |
| 23 | 2001 | 28/31 | 1.9 | 2.8 | 63.4% | 63.8% | 48.8% | 56.3% | 47.9% | 58.0% | 39.9% | 1996 | 7/10 | 2.1 | 4.0 | 58.5% | 69.3% | 46.1% | 51.7% | 41.0% | 60.0% | 42.4% |
| 24 | 2002 | 36/42 | 2.4 | 2.0 | 62.2% | 68.3% | 53.4% | 61.1% | 46.8% | 62.5% | 40.3% | 1997 | 31/41 | 4.3 | 3.4 | 58.0% | 66.1% | 50.7% | 54.6% | 38.3% | 59.6% | 35.6% |
| 25 | 2003 | 49/50 | 2.4 | 3.0 | 57.7% | 63.0% | 46.4% | 51.1% | 42.2% | 56.0% | 41.6% | 1998 | 33/43 | 4.5 | 3.1 | 60.5% | 71.0% | 50.9% | 61.1% | 43.1% | 63.0% | 38.8% |
| 26 | 2004 | 46/47 | 2.6 | 1.7 | 62.0% | 66.7% | 46.3% | 53.7% | 44.2% | 58.9% | 38.0% | 1999 | 33/44 | 3.8 | 2.5 | 60.7% | 70.1% | 50.3% | 68.4% | 40.9% | 62.0% | 39.0% |
| 27 | 2005 | 24/24 | 2.7 | 2.0 | 60.7% | 61.7% | 45.0% | 48.8% | 50.5% | 55.1% | 36.9% | 2000 | 33/41 | 3.7 | 3.0 | 60.4% | 66.5% | 45.5% | 55.1% | 39.0% | 58.0% | 38.0% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 32/35 | 3.7 | 3.3 | 59.1% | 68.7% | 48.5% | 54.0% | 46.3% | 60.2% | 38.1% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 29/32 | 5.0 | 3.2 | 56.7% | 67.3% | 49.4% | 51.7% | 39.2% | 59.6% | 34.2% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 54/54 | 4.1 | 3.4 | 61.7% | 69.5% | 51.8% | 57.0% | 47.3% | 62.8% | 39.6% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 43/44 | 4.8 | 3.0 | 63.2% | 67.8% | 48.6% | 52.9% | 33.9% | 60.3% | 36.8% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 12/12 | 3.0 | 4.3 | 59.9% | 56.7% | 37.4% | 46.5% | 49.0% | 48.7% | 30.9% |
| 33 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2/2 | 0.5 | 6.5 | 60.0% | 56.3% | 39.5% | 57.7% | 16.7% | 49.5% | 28.9% |
| Career | — | 195/206 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 61.1% | 64.6% | 47.9% | 54.4% | 45.9% | 58.0% | 39.8% | — | 313/364 | 4.1 | 3.2 | 60.3% | 67.9% | 48.9% | 56.3% | 41.4% | 60.3% | 37.5% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | David Sanchez | Sargis Sargsian | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | 1997 | 1485 | 100.6 | -0.51 | -1.79 | 0.822 | 45.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | +0.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 1471 | 104.6 | -2.05 | -2.35 | 0.668 | 42.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.14 | 1993 | 1514 | 106.3 | -1.99 | -0.78 | 0.850 | 47.7% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.20 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | -0.04 |
| 21 | 1999 | 1459 | 100.5 | +1.82 | -0.89 | 0.731 | 44.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 1520 | 112.3 | -1.67 | +2.95 | 1.115 | 52.6% | — | +50 | — | 43.8% | -0.25 | 0–1 | 1–3 (25%) | — | +0.14 | 1995 | 1568 | 112.7 | -0.77 | +0.75 | 0.802 | 46.7% | +23 | — | — | 40.0% | -0.73 | 2–0 | 1–0 | — | -0.16 |
| 23 | 2001 | 1569 | 122.4 | -2.13 | +0.89 | 0.950 | 49.3% | -119 | +88 | — | 36.8% | -0.53 | 4–3 (57%) | 4–5 (44%) | — | +0.08 | 1996 | 1577 | 128.3 | -1.13 | +3.09 | 1.060 | 51.0% | +44 | — | — | 45.5% | 0.00 | 0–2 | 0–2 | — | +0.38 |
| 24 | 2002 | 1634 | 136.6 | +0.29 | +1.36 | 1.077 | 51.3% | -252 | +126 | — | 49.5% | +0.31 | 3–7 (30%) | 4–6 (40%) | — | +0.51 | 1997 | 1628 | 125.8 | -1.73 | -0.98 | 0.881 | 47.6% | -2 | -131 | +80 | 42.7% | -0.72 | 7–9 (44%) | 10–6 (63%) | — | -0.39 |
| 25 | 2003 | 1623 | 130.4 | -4.92 | +3.22 | 0.946 | 48.8% | -236 | +146 | — | 46.6% | -0.31 | 10–8 (56%) | 7–5 (58%) | — | +0.42 | 1998 | 1618 | 121.9 | +0.65 | +0.48 | 1.050 | 50.9% | -61 | -75 | +114 | 46.4% | -0.07 | 6–11 (35%) | 8–12 (40%) | — | +1.49 |
| 26 | 2004 | 1574 | 133.1 | -3.41 | +1.28 | 0.923 | 48.4% | -117 | +123 | — | 43.9% | -0.35 | 6–10 (38%) | 6–10 (38%) | — | -0.88 | 1999 | 1637 | 132.5 | +0.09 | +1.23 | 1.029 | 50.7% | -86 | +41 | +71 | 49.1% | -0.06 | 5–10 (33%) | 9–8 (53%) | — | -0.70 |
| 27 | 2005 | 1597 | 119.1 | -5.12 | -2.04 | 0.822 | 46.3% | -167 | +77 | — | 39.7% | -0.87 | 4–4 (50%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.21 | 2000 | 1566 | 128.7 | -2.68 | +0.64 | 0.906 | 47.9% | -40 | +100 | +90 | 37.0% | -0.66 | 5–8 (38%) | 5–4 (56%) | — | +1.47 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1625 | 130.0 | -2.01 | +0.60 | 0.956 | 49.3% | -63 | +51 | +50 | 46.7% | -0.18 | 5–7 (42%) | 5–4 (56%) | — | +0.20 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1650 | 127.4 | -1.35 | -1.75 | 0.846 | 47.0% | -4 | -26 | -15 | 41.7% | -0.71 | 5–5 (50%) | 8–6 (57%) | — | -0.86 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1775 | 142.7 | +1.40 | +2.44 | 1.066 | 51.2% | -3 | -112 | -142 | 53.7% | +0.49 | 4–6 (40%) | 4–8 (33%) | — | -1.63 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1697 | 135.9 | -1.71 | +0.83 | 0.929 | 48.5% | +25 | -58 | -94 | 40.7% | -0.52 | 8–6 (57%) | 8–6 (57%) | — | -2.22 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1589 | 91.9 | -8.24 | -4.38 | 0.602 | 40.3% | +84 | +23 | -61 | 22.2% | -2.26 | 1–0 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.23 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1577 | 106.8 | -0.31 | -1.11 | 0.571 | 39.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.75 | — | — | — | -0.39 |
| Career | — | 1719 | 132.7 | -3.01 | +1.32 | 0.948 | 49.0% | -180 | +114 | — | 43.2% | -0.35 | 27–33 (45%) | 24–31 (44%) | 99.3 | +0.27 | — | 1812 | 135.5 | -1.06 | +0.48 | 0.943 | 48.9% | -15 | -12 | +31 | 44.2% | -0.34 | 49–64 (43%) | 60–59 (50%) | 99.6 | -0.72 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gaston Gaudio | 1 | 6 | 7 | May 11, 2005 | H2H |
| Nicolas Massu | 3 | 3 | 6 | Jul 23, 2005 | H2H |
| Jose Acasuso | 3 | 3 | 6 | Sep 17, 2004 | H2H |
| Carlos Moya | 1 | 4 | 5 | May 12, 2004 | H2H |
| Christophe Rochus | 1 | 3 | 4 | Sep 29, 2005 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andre Agassi | 0 | 6 | 6 | Sep 8, 2004 | H2H |
| Nikolay Davydenko | 2 | 3 | 5 | Jul 7, 2005 | H2H |
| Sjeng Schalken | 2 | 3 | 5 | Mar 4, 2004 | H2H |
| Rainer Schuettler | 2 | 3 | 5 | Oct 25, 2003 | H2H |
| Albert Costa | 1 | 4 | 5 | Oct 9, 2003 | H2H |