H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Denis Istomin vs Guillermo Garcia-Lopez H2H: 1-4

Guillermo Garcia-Lopez holds a 4–1 lead over Denis Istomin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Guillermo Garcia-Lopez leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Guillermo Garcia-Lopez won the 2015 Rotterdam third round 7-6(5) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Denis Istomin
UZB Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 17, 2020 Delray Beach ATP 250 Q1 Q Hard Denis Istomin #164 7-5 6-2 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #181 Match data
Feb 12, 2015* Rotterdam ATP 500 R32 Hard Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #27 7-6(5) 6-4 Denis Istomin #64 Match data
Jun 19, 2014* Eastbourne ATP 250 R16 Grass Denis Istomin #49 6-2 7-5 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #31 Match data
Sep 21, 2013* St. Petersburg ATP 250 QF Hard Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #74 6-2 6-4 Denis Istomin #47 Match data
Apr 20, 2011* Barcelona ATP 500 R64 Clay Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #26 7-6(6) 6-3 Denis Istomin #55 Match data
Jun 18, 2010* Eastbourne ATP 250 SF Grass Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #41 3-6 6-3 6-4 Denis Istomin #74 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Denis Istomin #1,509 #33 1,217 1,900 191 245 43.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #1,009 #23 1,465 1,938 299 353 45.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Denis Istomin Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2006 0–2 0.0% #200 1,474 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — 2003 0–1 0.0% #244 1,497 0 0
21 2008 2–2 50.0% #105 1,559 0 0 2004 5–7 41.7% #129 1,578 0 0
22 2009 13–17 43.3% #102 1,636 0 0 2005 19–26 42.2% #91 1,589 0 0
23 2010 29–29 50.0% #40 1,767 0 0 2006 15–20 42.9% #68 1,595 0 0
24 2011 10–21 32.3% #73 1,665 0 0 2007 13–22 37.1% #90 1,526 0 0
25 2012 26–29 47.3% #43 1,732 0 0 2008 22–22 50.0% #62 1,646 0 0
26 2013 30–29 50.8% #45 1,808 0 0 2009 28–27 50.9% #41 1,757 0 1
27 2014 24–23 51.1% #49 1,853 0 0 2010 31–23 57.4% #33 1,874 0 2
28 2015 20–23 46.5% #61 1,788 0 1 2011 20–29 40.8% #65 1,712 0 2
29 2016 6–19 24.0% #121 1,711 0 1 2012 20–25 44.4% #76 1,719 0 2
30 2017 15–18 45.5% #63 1,724 0 2 2013 20–21 48.8% #62 1,774 0 2
31 2018 12–18 40.0% #92 1,679 0 2 2014 25–26 49.0% #36 1,740 0 3
32 2019 3–11 21.4% #177 1,567 0 2 2015 32–25 56.1% #27 1,853 0 5
33 2020 0–1 0.0% #184 1,545 0 2 2016 22–31 41.5% #70 1,686 0 5
34 2021 0–2 0.0% #254 1,545 0 2 2017 5–15 25.0% #70 1,747 0 5
35 2022 1–1 50.0% #467 1,577 0 2 2018 16–23 41.0% #105 1,675 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2019 6–10 37.5% #144 1,694 0 5