H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Denis Istomin vs Leonardo Mayer H2H: 2-1

Denis Istomin holds a 2–1 lead over Leonardo Mayer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Denis Istomin leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Denis Istomin won the 2015 Nottingham quarterfinal 6-3 6-7(8) 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Denis Istomin
UZB Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Leonardo Mayer
ARG Age 39 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 27, 2015* Nottingham ATP 250 QF Grass Denis Istomin #92 6-3 6-7(8) 7-6(6) Leonardo Mayer #21 Match data
Aug 3, 2010* Washington ATP 500 R64 Hard Denis Istomin #54 6-4 5-7 7-6(5) Leonardo Mayer #67 Match data
Aug 25, 2009* New Haven ATP 250 R64 Hard Leonardo Mayer #65 6-2 6-4 Denis Istomin #107 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Denis Istomin #1,509 #33 1,217 1,900 191 245 43.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Leonardo Mayer #748 #21 1,605 1,937 166 194 46.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Denis Istomin Leonardo Mayer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2006 0–2 0.0% #200 1,474 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2008 2–2 50.0% #105 1,559 0 0 2008 1–1 50.0% #115 1,476 0 0
22 2009 13–17 43.3% #102 1,636 0 0 2009 18–18 50.0% #75 1,674 0 0
23 2010 29–29 50.0% #40 1,767 0 0 2010 12–19 38.7% #94 1,652 0 0
24 2011 10–21 32.3% #73 1,665 0 0 2011 4–7 36.4% #78 1,677 0 0
25 2012 26–29 47.3% #43 1,732 0 0 2012 11–14 44.0% #71 1,725 0 0
26 2013 30–29 50.8% #45 1,808 0 0 2013 12–18 40.0% #94 1,715 0 0
27 2014 24–23 51.1% #49 1,853 0 0 2014 26–20 56.5% #28 1,830 0 1
28 2015 20–23 46.5% #61 1,788 0 1 2015 24–23 51.1% #35 1,837 0 1
29 2016 6–19 24.0% #121 1,711 0 1 2016 9–15 37.5% #139 1,727 0 1
30 2017 15–18 45.5% #63 1,724 0 2 2017 11–8 57.9% #52 1,796 0 2
31 2018 12–18 40.0% #92 1,679 0 2 2018 22–25 46.8% #56 1,746 0 2
32 2019 3–11 21.4% #177 1,567 0 2 2019 16–18 47.1% #92 1,710 0 2
33 2020 0–1 0.0% #184 1,545 0 2 2020 0–7 0.0% #135 1,605 0 2
34 2021 0–2 0.0% #254 1,545 0 2 2021 0–1 0.0% #309 1,520 0 2
35 2022 1–1 50.0% #467 1,577 0 2 — — — — — — —