H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Denis Istomin vs Michael Llodra H2H: 2-0
Denis Istomin holds a 2–0 lead over Michael Llodra in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Denis Istomin leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Denis Istomin won the 2012 Eastbourne third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UZB
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 46
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2012* | Eastbourne | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Denis Istomin | 6-4 6-3 | Michael Llodra | Match data |
| Aug 16, 2009 | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Denis Istomin | 6-3 7-6(5) | Michael Llodra | Match data |
| Oct 9, 2008* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Denis Istomin | 7-6(2) 6-3 | Michael Llodra | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denis Istomin | #1,509 | #33 | 1,217 | 1,900 | 191 | 245 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Michael Llodra | #631 | #21 | 1,575 | 1,901 | 182 | 215 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Denis Istomin | Michael Llodra | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #159 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #89 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #102 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #104 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 29–29 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #173 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #73 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #41 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2012 | 26–29 | 47.3% | #43 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2013 | 30–29 | 50.8% | #45 | 1,808 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2014 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #49 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #93 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2015 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #61 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #40 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2016 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #121 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #67 | 1,738 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2017 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #63 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #23 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2018 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,679 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #47 | 1,776 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 2019 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #177 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #53 | 1,842 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,545 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #105 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,545 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #269 | 1,688 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | 2022 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #467 | 1,577 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |