H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Denis Istomin vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 2-3

Sergiy Stakhovsky holds a 3–2 lead over Denis Istomin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Sergiy Stakhovsky leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Denis Istomin won the 2015 Nottingham fourth round 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Denis Istomin
UZB Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Sergiy Stakhovsky
UKR Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 26, 2015* Nottingham ATP 250 R16 Grass Denis Istomin #92 7-5 6-4 Sergiy Stakhovsky #49 Match data
Feb 26, 2015* Dubai ATP 500 R16 Hard Sergiy Stakhovsky #53 6-4 3-6 6-4 Denis Istomin #65 Match data
May 28, 2014* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Denis Istomin #49 6-3 6-4 2-6 6-3 Sergiy Stakhovsky #93 Match data
Apr 27, 2011* Munich ATP 250 R32 Clay Sergiy Stakhovsky #39 5-1 (ret.) Denis Istomin #56 Match data
Aug 28, 2010* New Haven ATP 250 F Hard Sergiy Stakhovsky #47 3-6 6-3 6-4 Denis Istomin #46 Match data
Oct 8, 2007 Moscow ATP 250 Q2 Q Hard Denis Istomin #215 7-6(2) 7-6(3) Sergiy Stakhovsky #243 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Denis Istomin #1,509 #33 1,217 1,900 191 245 43.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Sergiy Stakhovsky #678 #31 1,263 1,839 145 195 42.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Denis Istomin Sergiy Stakhovsky
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
2006 0–2 0.0% #200 1,474 0 0 2004 0–1 0.0% #335 1,492 0 0
2008 2–2 50.0% #105 1,559 0 0 2005 3–3 50.0% #184 1,528 0 0
2009 13–17 43.3% #102 1,636 0 0 2006 1–2 33.3% #195 1,526 0 0
2010 29–29 50.0% #40 1,767 0 0 2007 0–2 0.0% #199 1,509 0 0
2011 10–21 32.3% #73 1,665 0 0 2008 5–4 55.6% #92 1,614 0 1
2012 26–29 47.3% #43 1,732 0 0 2009 14–13 51.9% #60 1,750 0 2
2013 30–29 50.8% #45 1,808 0 0 2010 24–24 50.0% #46 1,743 0 4
2014 24–23 51.1% #49 1,853 0 0 2011 22–26 45.8% #62 1,707 0 4
2015 20–23 46.5% #61 1,788 0 1 2012 13–26 33.3% #103 1,739 0 4
2016 6–19 24.0% #121 1,711 0 1 2013 10–15 40.0% #98 1,679 0 4
2017 15–18 45.5% #63 1,724 0 2 2014 15–19 44.1% #58 1,686 0 4
2018 12–18 40.0% #92 1,679 0 2 2015 20–25 44.4% #62 1,715 0 4
2019 3–11 21.4% #177 1,567 0 2 2016 6–13 31.6% #109 1,693 0 4
2020 0–1 0.0% #184 1,545 0 2 2017 6–8 42.9% #122 1,728 0 4
2021 0–2 0.0% #254 1,545 0 2 2018 2–5 28.6% #134 1,649 0 4
2022 1–1 50.0% #467 1,577 0 2 2019 3–6 33.3% #150 1,576 0 4
— — — — — — — 2020 0–1 0.0% #202 1,568 0 4
— — — — — — — 2021 1–2 33.3% #220 1,530 0 4