H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Denis Istomin vs Viktor Troicki H2H: 1-2

Viktor Troicki holds a 2–1 lead over Denis Istomin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Viktor Troicki leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Viktor Troicki won the 2018 Sofia round of 16 7-6(4) 1-6 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Denis Istomin
UZB Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Viktor Troicki
SRB Age 40 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Viktor Troicki #67 7-6(4) 1-6 7-6(5) Denis Istomin #74 Match data Feb 9, 2018* R16 Sofia ATP 250 Hard
Viktor Troicki #15 6-1 6-4 Denis Istomin #61 Match data Sep 30, 2011* R16 Kuala Lumpur ATP 250 Hard
Denis Istomin #46 7-6(10) 3-6 6-2 Viktor Troicki #45 Match data Aug 27, 2010* SF New Haven ATP 250 Hard
Viktor Troicki #137 6-4 6-3 Denis Istomin #215 Match data Oct 9, 2007* Q3 Q Moscow International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Denis Istomin #1,509 #33 1,217 1,914 196 249 44.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Viktor Troicki #1,433 #12 2,015 2,006 270 259 51.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Denis Istomin Viktor Troicki
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2006 0–2 0.0% #200 1,474 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — 2006 1–1 50.0% #211 1,496 0 0
21 2008 2–2 50.0% #105 1,559 0 0 2007 5–7 41.7% #127 1,634 0 0
22 2009 13–17 43.3% #102 1,635 0 0 2008 19–19 50.0% #57 1,791 0 0
23 2010 29–29 50.0% #40 1,767 0 0 2009 27–27 50.0% #29 1,805 0 0
24 2011 10–21 32.3% #73 1,665 0 0 2010 36–25 59.0% #28 1,925 0 1
25 2012 28–30 48.3% #43 1,751 0 0 2011 34–24 58.6% #22 1,846 0 1
26 2013 30–29 50.8% #45 1,811 0 0 2012 21–27 43.8% #38 1,766 0 1
27 2014 27–24 52.9% #49 1,860 0 0 2013 18–18 50.0% #75 1,824 0 1
28 2015 20–23 46.5% #61 1,789 0 1 2014 8–4 66.7% #101 1,903 0 1
29 2016 6–20 23.1% #121 1,707 0 1 2015 33–27 55.0% #22 1,847 0 2
30 2017 15–18 45.5% #63 1,723 0 2 2016 33–28 54.1% #29 1,896 0 3
31 2018 12–18 40.0% #92 1,678 0 2 2017 23–28 45.1% #55 1,814 0 3
32 2019 3–11 21.4% #177 1,575 0 2 2018 6–13 31.6% #205 1,668 0 3
33 2020 0–1 0.0% #184 1,552 0 2 2019 4–4 50.0% #158 1,643 0 3
34 2021 0–3 0.0% #254 1,537 0 2 2020 1–3 25.0% #201 1,648 0 3
35 2022 1–1 50.0% #467 1,570 0 2 2021 1–4 20.0% #232 1,650 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Denis Istomin Viktor Troicki
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2008 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2009 9 12 21 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2008 14 12 26 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
23 2010 17 19 36 47.2% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2009 19 17 36 52.8% 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
24 2011 7 10 17 41.2% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2010 28 17 45 62.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
25 2012 17 17 34 50.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — 2011 24 17 41 58.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
26 2013 25 19 44 56.8% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2012 13 17 30 43.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
27 2014 13 17 30 43.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2013 3 7 10 30.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2015 9 15 24 37.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2014 6 3 9 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
29 2016 1 10 11 9.1% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2015 19 17 36 52.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 10 4 14 71.4% — — — —
30 2017 11 8 19 57.9% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2016 27 20 47 57.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
31 2018 5 8 13 38.5% 4 7 11 36.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2017 16 19 35 45.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
32 2019 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2018 5 10 15 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
34 2021 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2020 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 119 148 267 44.6% 40 67 107 37.4% 37 33 70 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — 179 168 347 51.6% 58 60 118 49.2% 33 31 64 51.6% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 437/445 of Denis Istomin's and 521/529 of Viktor Troicki's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Denis Istomin Viktor Troicki
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2006 2/2 7.5 2.0 61.5% 66.3% 47.4% 60.2% 22.2% 59.1% 27.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 2/2 8.0 1.0 61.4% 70.4% 53.0% 43.3% 63.9% 63.8% 37.0%
21 2008 4/4 4.5 2.0 62.2% 68.4% 49.7% 65.1% 38.0% 61.3% 35.4% 2007 12/12 4.2 3.7 59.0% 64.4% 42.5% 46.9% 45.4% 55.6% 37.8%
22 2009 29/30 6.6 2.7 66.1% 69.8% 48.8% 54.8% 41.5% 62.4% 34.1% 2008 37/38 6.2 2.2 61.7% 73.4% 51.5% 51.7% 37.9% 65.0% 37.2%
23 2010 58/58 6.7 1.5 65.3% 70.2% 53.9% 54.2% 41.5% 64.5% 36.2% 2009 54/54 6.9 2.6 57.6% 70.1% 44.7% 60.8% 46.7% 58.8% 36.4%
24 2011 31/31 5.5 2.2 64.3% 64.3% 49.6% 56.0% 36.7% 59.3% 34.6% 2010 59/61 9.2 2.9 60.1% 75.0% 50.6% 59.4% 46.1% 64.9% 41.3%
25 2012 54/58 7.1 1.7 63.9% 70.8% 52.2% 58.0% 39.1% 64.1% 35.8% 2011 58/58 7.9 2.4 58.9% 72.9% 47.2% 63.6% 47.1% 62.2% 39.9%
26 2013 59/59 6.3 2.0 63.2% 72.0% 51.6% 64.5% 39.1% 64.4% 35.1% 2012 47/48 8.1 2.3 59.7% 70.0% 44.0% 52.2% 42.4% 59.3% 36.5%
27 2014 50/51 7.0 1.6 67.9% 72.2% 50.5% 58.6% 39.9% 65.0% 34.8% 2013 36/36 6.7 2.1 59.6% 70.5% 47.5% 49.6% 43.4% 61.2% 37.5%
28 2015 43/43 5.7 1.3 63.5% 72.5% 51.8% 58.3% 38.9% 64.8% 36.5% 2014 12/12 9.1 2.2 55.0% 79.4% 52.5% 59.5% 45.9% 66.9% 40.2%
29 2016 25/26 6.8 2.1 63.5% 69.9% 49.2% 52.9% 44.8% 62.3% 33.7% 2015 60/60 10.0 2.0 62.9% 74.5% 49.8% 57.1% 41.3% 65.5% 36.2%
30 2017 33/33 8.4 1.7 65.4% 72.3% 50.1% 59.7% 44.3% 64.7% 34.2% 2016 60/61 8.5 2.3 61.2% 74.2% 49.9% 56.0% 40.2% 64.7% 36.7%
31 2018 30/30 5.7 1.5 68.7% 71.0% 51.0% 56.5% 34.9% 64.5% 34.3% 2017 49/51 6.6 3.2 60.7% 71.2% 46.7% 53.9% 41.1% 61.8% 35.4%
32 2019 14/14 5.5 2.0 65.7% 72.4% 49.2% 56.9% 39.4% 64.5% 30.6% 2018 19/19 8.2 3.2 63.5% 69.8% 41.2% 53.1% 33.5% 59.3% 33.5%
33 2020 1/1 2.0 2.0 64.0% 65.6% 27.8% 60.0% 0.0% 52.0% 28.3% 2019 8/8 8.0 4.3 62.0% 72.5% 51.7% 53.0% 46.4% 64.7% 33.0%
34 2021 2/3 2.0 2.5 72.1% 64.6% 44.2% 50.8% — 59.2% 19.8% 2020 3/4 8.3 1.3 72.0% 67.1% 48.2% 57.3% 32.3% 61.5% 31.7%
35 2022 2/2 3.5 1.5 68.0% 69.9% 41.1% 72.2% 21.4% 60.5% 33.4% 2021 5/5 7.8 1.2 63.5% 74.1% 55.0% 44.1% 19.9% 66.4% 26.2%
Career — 437/445 6.5 1.8 65.1% 70.7% 51.0% 57.9% 39.5% 63.8% 34.9% — 521/529 7.9 2.5 60.4% 72.4% 47.9% 56.1% 42.7% 62.6% 37.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Denis Istomin Viktor Troicki
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2006 1474 112.2 +1.83 +2.43 0.669 43.4% — — — 16.7% -2.34 0–1 1–1 — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 1486 103.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1497 108.2 +2.42 +2.63 1.020 50.3% — — — 40.0% +0.60 1–0 0–3 (0%) — -0.15
21 2008 1559 115.8 -0.37 +0.78 0.914 48.9% +45 — — 50.0% -0.08 — 2–2 (50%) — +0.02 2007 1634 117.7 -4.28 -0.04 0.852 47.0% -40 +23 — 44.4% -0.89 3–2 (60%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.12
22 2009 1636 125.3 -1.33 -1.62 0.907 48.6% +16 -133 -53 42.9% -0.57 5–2 (71%) 7–10 (41%) — +1.12 2008 1791 139.5 +1.49 +1.42 1.065 50.4% +8 -175 -178 49.4% -0.01 4–6 (40%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.41
23 2010 1768 143.4 +1.15 +0.13 1.018 50.4% -22 -228 -27 51.7% +0.19 13–12 (52%) 15–11 (58%) — -0.33 2009 1806 148.2 -2.68 +0.14 0.884 48.1% +16 -130 -137 48.4% -0.29 9–5 (64%) 7–8 (47%) — -2.24
24 2011 1666 130.3 -2.79 -1.92 0.850 47.1% +33 -165 +77 37.3% -0.88 1–5 (17%) 7–3 (70%) — -1.16 2010 1925 159.4 +1.84 +4.42 1.176 52.7% +14 -165 -279 57.0% +0.59 8–9 (47%) 9–12 (43%) — -1.68
25 2012 1751 150.1 +1.09 -0.48 0.999 50.0% -33 -229 +124 48.6% +0.04 10–10 (50%) 14–14 (50%) — -1.49 2011 1847 157.5 +0.04 +2.75 1.056 51.0% +36 +1 -155 58.3% +0.38 5–7 (42%) 9–11 (45%) — +1.82
26 2013 1812 153.1 +0.94 -0.48 0.987 49.9% +15 -243 -31 50.0% +0.05 10–10 (50%) 11–13 (46%) — -0.77 2012 1766 146.1 -2.61 -0.08 0.896 48.1% -2 +12 -4 45.3% -0.24 10–8 (56%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.30
27 2014 1860 158.1 +1.45 -0.54 0.996 50.0% +1 -139 -14 52.7% +0.11 8–9 (47%) 13–14 (48%) — -3.30 2013 1825 139.7 -1.42 -0.04 0.966 49.1% -123 +24 -40 51.1% -0.08 5–3 (63%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.52
28 2015 1790 143.8 +0.64 +0.10 1.036 50.5% -25 -86 +93 48.4% +0.09 3–7 (30%) 8–8 (50%) — -1.14 2014 1904 142.7 +2.91 +1.97 1.214 53.2% -67 -35 — 62.5% +0.75 1–1 3–2 (60%) — -0.99
29 2016 1707 140.8 -0.07 -2.12 0.894 48.4% -28 -26 +126 33.8% -0.85 2–5 (29%) 5–6 (45%) — -2.01 2015 1847 149.3 +0.59 +0.86 1.051 50.6% -26 -34 +98 51.5% +0.18 14–8 (64%) 14–17 (45%) — +1.04
30 2017 1723 138.9 +1.33 -1.58 0.968 49.5% +6 -29 -40 45.2% -0.31 6–4 (60%) 9–7 (56%) — -0.43 2016 1896 159.7 +1.47 +0.63 1.039 50.5% +8 -14 -47 50.6% -0.07 14–7 (67%) 18–7 (72%) — +0.26
31 2018 1679 132.6 +0.11 -1.51 0.968 49.0% -23 +18 +38 45.8% -0.11 4–6 (40%) 10–14 (42%) — -0.46 2017 1814 148.1 -1.84 -0.08 0.926 48.5% +24 +20 -93 43.4% -0.58 9–5 (64%) 13–8 (62%) — -1.56
32 2019 1576 124.0 -0.42 -1.96 0.862 47.8% +79 +78 — 25.8% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.40 2018 1668 123.1 -3.95 -1.30 0.822 46.3% +48 +95 — 33.3% -0.92 5–5 (50%) 5–9 (36%) — -0.36
33 2020 1552 113.0 -1.58 +7.36 0.589 40.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.19 2019 1643 117.7 +0.21 -1.72 0.935 48.8% +10 — +142 47.8% -0.39 2–1 (67%) 3–0 (100%) — +0.39
34 2021 1538 107.3 -0.95 -2.93 0.484 41.2% — — — 12.5% -2.25 0–1 1–0 — -0.06 2020 1648 116.8 -1.33 -1.24 0.824 47.6% +41 — — 37.5% -0.25 1–1 0–1 — +0.12
35 2022 1571 110.4 -1.64 -0.13 0.846 46.2% — — — 50.0% -1.00 — 1–0 — -0.06 2021 1650 110.9 +0.71 -3.52 0.779 46.0% — — — 30.8% -0.92 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.04
Career — 1914 147.1 +0.44 -0.79 0.963 49.4% -2 -119 +38 46.1% -0.19 63–74 (46%) 107–108 (50%) 101.5 -2.45 — 2006 151.3 -0.39 +1.02 0.995 49.8% +6 -32 -45 49.9% -0.05 91–69 (57%) 106–105 (50%) 103.5 -0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.