H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Denis Istomin vs Viktor Troicki H2H: 1-2
Viktor Troicki holds a 2–1 lead over Denis Istomin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Viktor Troicki leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Viktor Troicki won the 2018 Sofia fourth round 7-6(4) 1-6 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UZB
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 40
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2018* | Sofia | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Viktor Troicki | 7-6(4) 1-6 7-6(5) | Denis Istomin | Match data |
| Sep 30, 2011* | Kuala Lumpur | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Viktor Troicki | 6-1 6-4 | Denis Istomin | Match data |
| Aug 27, 2010* | New Haven | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Denis Istomin | 7-6(10) 3-6 6-2 | Viktor Troicki | Match data |
| Oct 9, 2007* | Moscow | ATP 250 | Q3 | Hard | Viktor Troicki | 6-4 6-3 | Denis Istomin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denis Istomin | #1,509 | #33 | 1,217 | 1,900 | 191 | 245 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Viktor Troicki | #1,433 | #12 | 2,015 | 2,008 | 268 | 256 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Denis Istomin | Viktor Troicki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #211 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #127 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #102 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 29–29 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,803 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #73 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #28 | 1,935 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2012 | 26–29 | 47.3% | #43 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #22 | 1,846 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2013 | 30–29 | 50.8% | #45 | 1,808 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #38 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2014 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #49 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #75 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2015 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #61 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #101 | 1,903 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2016 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #121 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #22 | 1,844 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2017 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #63 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #29 | 1,895 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2018 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,679 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #55 | 1,814 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2019 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #177 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #205 | 1,647 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,545 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,635 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,545 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,634 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | 2022 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #467 | 1,577 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #232 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 |