H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Denis Shapovalov vs Bernard Tomic H2H: 1-0
Denis Shapovalov holds a 1–0 lead over Bernard Tomic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Denis Shapovalov leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Denis Shapovalov won the 2021 Australian Open second round 6-1 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Canada
Age 27
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Australia
Age 33
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2021* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Denis Shapovalov | 6-1 6-3 6-2 | Bernard Tomic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denis Shapovalov | #39 | #10 | 3,625 | 2,011 | 224 | 190 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Bernard Tomic | #206 | #17 | 1,885 | 1,968 | 170 | 182 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Denis Shapovalov | Bernard Tomic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #286 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #250 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #208 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2017 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2018 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #27 | 1,868 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #52 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2019 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #15 | 2,002 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #51 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2020 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #12 | 1,884 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #56 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2021 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #14 | 1,904 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #18 | 1,913 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2022 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #18 | 1,915 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #26 | 1,872 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2023 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,726 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2024 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #56 | 1,887 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #83 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2025 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #23 | 1,791 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #185 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2026 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,613 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #192 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 |