H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Denis Shapovalov vs Botic van de Zandschulp H2H: 1-2
Botic van de Zandschulp holds a 2–1 lead over Denis Shapovalov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Botic van de Zandschulp leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Botic van de Zandschulp won the 2026 Miami Open Presented by Itau first round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Canada
Age 27
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
Netherlands
Age 30
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2026 | Miami Open Presented by Itau | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Botic van de Zandschulp | 7-5 6-3 | Denis Shapovalov | Match data |
| Aug 28, 2024* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Botic van de Zandschulp | 6-4 7-5 6-4 | Denis Shapovalov | Match data |
| Mar 8, 2024* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Denis Shapovalov | 6-1 6-4 | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denis Shapovalov | #39 | #10 | 3,625 | 2,011 | 224 | 190 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #55 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,932 | 114 | 118 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Denis Shapovalov | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #250 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2017 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2018 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #27 | 1,868 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2019 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #15 | 2,002 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2020 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #12 | 1,884 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2021 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #14 | 1,904 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2022 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #18 | 1,915 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2023 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2024 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #56 | 1,887 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2025 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #23 | 1,791 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2026 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |