H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Denis Shapovalov vs Marin Cilic H2H: 3-4

Marin Cilic holds a 4–3 lead over Denis Shapovalov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Denis Shapovalov leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Marin Cilic leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Marin Cilic won the 2026 Libema Open third round 6-7(5) 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Denis Shapovalov
Canada Age 27 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main draw meetings
Marin Cilic
Croatia Age 37 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 8, 2026 Libema Open ATP 250 R32 Grass Marin Cilic #47 6-7(5) 6-4 7-5 Denis Shapovalov #42 Match data
Jan 22, 2026 Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Marin Cilic #70 6-4 6-3 6-2 Denis Shapovalov #23 Match data
Jun 12, 2021* Stuttgart ATP 250 QF Grass Marin Cilic #47 7-5 7-6(3) Denis Shapovalov #14 Match data
Aug 24, 2020 Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Denis Shapovalov #17 6-3 6-3 Marin Cilic #37 Match data
Feb 21, 2020* Marseille ATP 250 R16 Hard Denis Shapovalov #15 6-4 4-6 6-2 Marin Cilic #39 Match data
Mar 12, 2019* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Denis Shapovalov #25 6-4 6-2 Marin Cilic #11 Match data
Oct 25, 2018* Basel ATP 500 R32 Hard Marin Cilic #6 6-4 6-2 Denis Shapovalov #29 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Denis Shapovalov #39 #10 3,625 2,011 224 190 54.1% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Marin Cilic #88 #3 5,155 2,195 572 344 62.4% 1 1 0 2 17 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Denis Shapovalov Marin Cilic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #587 1,486 0 0
17 2016 1–2 33.3% #250 1,519 0 0 2006 5–9 35.7% #170 1,499 0 0
18 2017 9–9 50.0% #51 1,749 0 0 2007 12–12 50.0% #71 1,714 0 0
19 2018 33–27 55.0% #27 1,868 0 0 2008 36–23 61.0% #23 1,904 0 1
20 2019 34–25 57.6% #15 2,002 0 1 2009 45–20 69.2% #14 1,989 0 3
21 2020 15–13 53.6% #12 1,884 0 1 2010 38–21 64.4% #14 1,854 0 5
22 2021 31–20 60.8% #14 1,904 0 1 2011 40–23 63.5% #21 1,963 0 6
23 2022 30–23 56.6% #18 1,915 0 1 2012 37–17 68.5% #15 2,009 0 8
24 2023 13–13 50.0% #109 1,857 0 1 2013 24–13 64.9% #37 1,964 0 9
25 2024 23–22 51.1% #56 1,887 0 2 2014 51–21 70.8% #9 2,127 1 13
26 2025 26–22 54.2% #23 1,791 0 4 2015 35–19 64.8% #13 2,061 1 14
27 2026 9–14 39.1% #39 1,682 0 4 2016 42–20 67.7% #6 2,133 1 16
28 — — — — — — — 2017 43–22 66.2% #6 2,055 1 17
29 — — — — — — — 2018 40–19 67.8% #7 2,056 1 18
30 — — — — — — — 2019 22–20 52.4% #39 1,911 1 18
31 — — — — — — — 2020 11–11 50.0% #42 1,850 1 18
32 — — — — — — — 2021 31–18 63.3% #30 1,933 1 20
33 — — — — — — — 2022 32–20 61.5% #17 1,958 1 20
34 — — — — — — — 2023 1–2 33.3% #672 1,912 1 20
35 — — — — — — — 2024 6–8 42.9% #179 1,816 1 21
36 — — — — — — — 2025 8–11 42.1% #73 1,819 1 21
37 — — — — — — — 2026 13–14 48.1% #88 1,758 1 21