H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 01:16 UTC
Denis Shapovalov vs Mikhail Kukushkin H2H: 0-1
Mikhail Kukushkin holds a 1–0 lead over Denis Shapovalov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mikhail Kukushkin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mikhail Kukushkin won the 2019 Marseille fourth round 6-4 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Canada
Age 27
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Kazakhstan
Age 38
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2019* | Marseille | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Mikhail Kukushkin | 6-4 7-6(4) | Denis Shapovalov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denis Shapovalov | #39 | #10 | 3,625 | 2,011 | 224 | 190 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Mikhail Kukushkin | #316 | #39 | 1,075 | 1,907 | 144 | 218 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Denis Shapovalov | Mikhail Kukushkin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #250 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2017 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2018 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #27 | 1,868 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2019 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #15 | 2,002 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #148 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2020 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #12 | 1,884 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #132 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2021 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #14 | 1,904 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #59 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2022 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #18 | 1,915 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #91 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2023 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #107 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2024 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #56 | 1,887 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #67 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2025 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #23 | 1,791 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2026 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #65 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #89 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #74 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #53 | 1,834 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #67 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #89 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #182 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #188 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #264 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #113 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #298 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |