H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Denis Shapovalov vs Nick Kyrgios H2H: 1-0
Denis Shapovalov holds a 1–0 lead over Nick Kyrgios in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Denis Shapovalov leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Denis Shapovalov won the 2016 Canada Masters second round 7-6(2) 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Canada
Age 27
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Australia
Age 31
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2016* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Denis Shapovalov | 7-6(2) 3-6 6-3 | Nick Kyrgios | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denis Shapovalov | #39 | #10 | 3,625 | 2,011 | 224 | 190 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Nick Kyrgios | #670 | #13 | 2,460 | 2,153 | 197 | 115 | 63.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Denis Shapovalov | Nick Kyrgios | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #250 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2017 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2018 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #27 | 1,868 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #52 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2019 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #15 | 2,002 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #30 | 1,935 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2020 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #12 | 1,884 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 39–15 | 72.2% | #13 | 2,058 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2021 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #14 | 1,904 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,986 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2022 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #18 | 1,915 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #35 | 1,965 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2023 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,935 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2024 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #56 | 1,887 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #45 | 1,951 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2025 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #23 | 1,791 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,878 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2026 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 40–12 | 76.9% | #22 | 2,096 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 2,067 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #671 | 1,969 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #670 | 1,896 | 0 | 7 |