H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Denis Shapovalov vs Nikoloz Basilashvili H2H: 1-2
Nikoloz Basilashvili holds a 2–1 lead over Denis Shapovalov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Nikoloz Basilashvili leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Denis Shapovalov won the 2022 Rome Masters third round 6-4 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Canada
Age 27
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
Georgia
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2022* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Denis Shapovalov | 6-4 7-6(5) | Nikoloz Basilashvili | Match data |
| Oct 9, 2018* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Nikoloz Basilashvili | 6-2 6-2 | Denis Shapovalov | Match data |
| Apr 27, 2018* | Budapest | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Nikoloz Basilashvili | 6-2 6-4 | Denis Shapovalov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denis Shapovalov | #39 | #10 | 3,625 | 2,011 | 224 | 190 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Nikoloz Basilashvili | #135 | #16 | 2,156 | 1,953 | 149 | 180 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Denis Shapovalov | Nikoloz Basilashvili | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #250 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2017 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2018 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #27 | 1,868 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2019 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #15 | 2,002 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2020 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #12 | 1,884 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2021 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #14 | 1,904 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2022 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #18 | 1,915 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2023 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2024 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #56 | 1,887 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #59 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2025 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #23 | 1,791 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #21 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2026 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #26 | 1,847 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #40 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #22 | 1,865 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 15–27 | 35.7% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #596 | 1,519 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #109 | 1,704 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #135 | 1,654 | 0 | 5 |