H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Denis Shapovalov vs Tomas Berdych H2H: 2-1
Denis Shapovalov holds a 2–1 lead over Tomas Berdych in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Denis Shapovalov leads 1–0 on clay, while Tomas Berdych leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Denis Shapovalov won the 2019 Rotterdam fourth round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Canada
Age 27
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2019* | Rotterdam | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Denis Shapovalov | 6-4 6-3 | Tomas Berdych | Match data |
| May 15, 2018* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Denis Shapovalov | 1-6 6-3 7-6(5) | Tomas Berdych | Match data |
| Jun 23, 2017* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Tomas Berdych | 7-6(4) 6-7(4) 7-5 | Denis Shapovalov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denis Shapovalov | #39 | #10 | 3,625 | 2,011 | 224 | 190 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Tomas Berdych | #104 | #4 | 5,230 | 2,232 | 594 | 321 | 64.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Denis Shapovalov | Tomas Berdych | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #250 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2017 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #45 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2018 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #27 | 1,868 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #24 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2019 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #15 | 2,002 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,933 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2020 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #12 | 1,884 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,913 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2021 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #14 | 1,904 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #20 | 1,919 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2022 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #18 | 1,915 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #20 | 1,885 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2023 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #6 | 1,919 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2024 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #56 | 1,887 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #7 | 2,080 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2025 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #23 | 1,791 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 52–20 | 72.2% | #6 | 2,157 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2026 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #7 | 2,084 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 53–22 | 70.7% | #7 | 2,082 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #6 | 2,109 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #10 | 2,080 | 0 | 13 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #19 | 2,027 | 0 | 13 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #71 | 1,909 | 0 | 13 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #104 | 1,869 | 0 | 13 |